I support the NASA space effort but the problem that I have with it is that takes up so much of the total NASA budget.
In my other life, I was a member of an industry advisory committee to NASA Aeronautics(the first A in NASA) and the Aeronautics Branch recieved less than 6% of the NASA budget and had to really fight for that. The other 94+% went to the Space branch. The argument was that , A) the taxpayer is very much for the Shuttle, space flight, etc, and B) the aviation industry can do pay for there own advanced research, or use military research. Well the military stuf is often too costly to pay it's way onto a non-military airplane and the non-space and non military avaiation industry provides more jobs that the space effort and military avaition and was the single biggest contibutor to helping the to reduce the balance of payments in the export markets for many years.(It still may be that way but I don't follow it anymore.) I'd like to see a little more balance in the Aronautics budget, maybe to 8-10%, but it won't happen because the average person is not that enamored by this. The major competitor to the US aviation indusry is EADS of which Airbus is a part and France, Germany, England, Italy, Spain, etc provide direct support to new airplane development program, plus provide research support also. So that's my opinion on this subject for wahatever it's worth.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Case Farm Equipment - by Jeremy Sweeten. My name is Jeremy Sweeten and I am currently a junior at Purdue University. I am takin a dual major in Agriculture Systems Management and Agronomy. I am from North Central Indiana, Miami County to be exact. My dad teaches for Marion Community School Systems an outdoor lab called Asherwood. We live there to manage the place. They just happen to have a Case 311 with a Triple Range transmission. I grew up mowing, pushing snow, and hauling maple sap with it. In 1986 my parents bought an old,
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
Late 50s early 60s international harvester 560 with cultivator
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
