Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  

Re: Case-IH MXU125 versus NH 8360


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by JoshuaGA on March 11, 2008 at 17:13:07 from (74.244.197.228):

In Reply to: Case-IH MXU125 versus NH 8360 posted by in-too-deep on March 11, 2008 at 15:41:14:

Can't help you too much here. I've been wondering the same about those tractors. Local dealer has a MXU115 Cab 4WD Flange axles on the lot, Lease return (Less than 1000 Hours), Suspect $50K to $55K cash deal.

I'm concerned over longevity. The tractors themselves is what I like. Mechanical motors, good proven transmissions, Hand controls on the 3PH W/Raise Lower switch, Electrohydraulic PTO, heavy duty drawbar support, and comfortable, very roomy cab. My concern with it however, lies in it's size. It appears to be a utility frame, and I'm afraid of overstressing it and breaking vital components. We currently own a Massey Ferguson 399, which in my opinion is nothing more than junk in heavy tillage. It simply does not perform in ripping, chiseling, or heavy harrowing land. It was built for light duty tillage, planting, spraying, and the PTO. Both rear axles were broke in it. Part of the reason for failure was putting duals on it, the extra traction didn't allow the wheels to slip when it needed to to save itself. Loud crack, pull to one side, and a sinking feeling in the gut. The drivetrains won't stand the stress. Thats my same fear with the MXU. If you are planning any heavy tillage, I hope you have another tractor. Myself, I wouldn't want that frame for that reason. A bigger frame in a near sized tractor should give better service in tillage.

If hay is your main concern (and I expect it is), It should be a good tractor for you. As I said, I expect the PTO to be the strong suit of these tractors. Should also be a good tractor to feed with. Being a smaller framed tractor, usually utility sized tractors are mor efficient in lighter work, and less efficient in heavier work.

I would be almost positive the loader brackets, if not the whole loader, would have to be replaced. I believe the frames are different. If it was an MXM, you would have no problems remounting.

Trade in, from what I see and hear, seems to bee half of retail, but in this market, it may have changed. I would suspect yours is worth between $30,000 and $40,000 dollars. Check a few tractor websites for some prices.

Just curious, do you own a lemon or something. I just don't see any benefit in your trade except 500 hours in favor of the Case. Any real reason or is this just a personal thing?

HTH

JoshuaGA


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
: :

:

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Seeing an Old Friend - by Joe Evans. Dad had a concrete contracting business starting in 1960. One of his first pieces of equipment was a Ferguson TO-35 with a Davis loader. Dad replaced the TO-35 with a MF 202 Workbull, essentially an industrialized Ferguson 35 I am told. Dad bought the 202 new in 1962, and I recall quite clearly going to the dealer with him to sign for it. ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy