Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Thanks


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Billy NY on September 06, 2007 at 12:11:45 from (205.188.117.74):

In Reply to: Thanks posted by dab on September 06, 2007 at 09:06:49:

It sounds like the influence is from the 10 acre subdivision as you said, well at least you know who is driving the opposition of the barn, you also need to collectively ascertain who else may be involved, know your enemy, but don't draw any attention to yourself in the investigative process of figuring out who is who. Next thing is to find out what the relationship is like between these people and the town officials, know the political climate there too.

If the zoning has not changed, and even if it did, does that mean that once changed, all existing buildings and their uses are now rescinded and must be demolished because someone got the zoning changed or was allowed a use variance within that zone which no longer allows such structures/uses. Of course not, what you describe is like someone applying for a use variance in reverse, eliminating a type of structure and it's use, which does not make much sense unless legal action was needed to be taken to rid a serious nuisance or due to some kind of horrific occurence like the compressed gas facility in Louisiana that blew up years ago, it was not allowed to be rebuilt, one example of that. It was done by emergency legislation I would assume, but a barn, should be grandfathered in, unless condemned for reason. All buildings have a set back from center line of road, old ones usually get grandfathered in, unless condemned by the state, eminent domain, which leads to condemnation proceedings.

It does not make any sense, a certain party or party's wants the barn gone, ok, hey I'd like to win the lottery too LOL, but on what grounds can they achieve this without legal action executed by the municipality. I am of the opinion it would have to be condemned first and appropriate legal action by the town or municipality taken, by the book, for it to happen, what else am I missing here or where am I off or plain wrong for one reason or another ? Forget about all that yuppy crap, heresay and whatever, get the facts on the table yourself, in an organized fashion, it may very well be that with your due diligence directed to the immediate attention to this matter, (read the zoning criteria, occupancy classifications and uses, the building codes, local laws, leglislation, the charter and anything that applies, state, county, local) you may uncover information supporting your cause, meaning the barn is not in violation of something that condemns it being there and it's use. I'd start immediately, and leave no stone unturned, you may be surprised at what you find out. You don't have to be an atty to do the leg work, at some point you may need to consult one, but do your homework first, sounds like it may be worth looking into, do it a.s.a.p. and be fully prepared well in advance of any future meetings,

I know you don't even own the place yet, you could still enter an agreement to purchase it, just make sure it is contingent on the barn staying and NOT being condemned or having to be removed, which would void the contract and be specified in same, similar to language used when a person enters an agreement to purchase a property or building, but is contingent upon planning and zoning approval, or the deal is off.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - An Old-Time Tractor Demonstration - by Kim Pratt. Sam was born in rural Kansas in 1926. His dad was a hard-working farmer and the children worked hard everyday to help ends meet. In the rural area he grew up in, the highlight of the week was Saturday when many people took a break from their work to go to town. It was on one such Saturday in the early 1940's when Sam was 16 years old that he ended up in Dennison, Kansas to watch a demonstration of a new tractor being put on by a local dealer. It was an Allis-Chalmers tractor dealership, ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy