Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Case Displacement
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by RAB on July 24, 2007 at 23:26:02 from (195.93.21.134):
In Reply to: Re: Case Displacement posted by Owen Aaland on July 24, 2007 at 17:22:22:
Ha, that is what they teach you at school. I know, I do it too. But an engineer knows it is really difficult to measure R so most just measure the diameter. It then makes much more sense to substitute D for R (so R squared is now D squared over four) for the calculation. Makes no practical sense using a formula containing a derived measurement. The reason it has been taught that way at school is because the proof of the area of a circle is from 'the limit of the area of a rectangle of R times half the circumference'. Only the sharpest can absorb circumference, area, area proof AND that D2/4 is just the same as R2. That is the way the exam boards set the Q's for this topic and the formula given is always in terms of the radius and not the diameter. They keep it simple at the learning stage whereas I keep it simple in the practical real world. When did you last measure a radius directly? None of the engine specs refer to the radius of the bore, do they? The circumference of a circle is Pi*D. Why divide D by two just to multiply it again in the formula, like they teach at school. As you said it does make it easier for calculating the displacement of an engine. Real world practicality. Only the sharper sets realise the value of cancelling when doing practical maths. So much for the advent of the cheap calculator! They just don't use their brain at school anymore, unless they have too. In my school days we used log tables to multiply sets of numbers (two, three or four at a time) so any cancelling first made things so much easier for the final calculation. Most Q's in exams fall apart if done this way (cancelling), but the majority of students just make life hard and calculate unecessary parts on the calculator. OK at school but not in the real world when the calc battery expires! Regards, RAB
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Ford Part Number Trivia - by Forum Participants. "Replaced by" means the part was superseded. All of my part books date back to 1964 and New Holland have changed some part numbers. They usually put the old Ford part number on the package. I was suppressed when I looked up the part number of the auxiliary drive shaft because for some reason the part number went through a radical change and it lost its "Basic Part Number". Ford part numbers follow the following rules. Most part numbers are in three parts. The middle part is called the
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|