Re: WD-45 Loader Operation

Posted by JMS/MN on February 16, 2007 at 22:32:54 from (204.73.106.15):

In Reply to: Re: WD-45 Loader Operation posted by Rick Fanning on February 16, 2007 at 08:21:58:

Yes. Both Greg's and Jack's idea will work. My choice would be the valves that Jack mentions, because of simplicity, although another idea would be to use a splitter valve IN the line going to the remote--one output to the loader, other outlet to the remote. Simple turn of a lever. With Greg's idea the only caution I see is the possibility of the loader frame bouncing and channel possibly irritating the seal on the cylinder cap. I have several Paulson loaders but can't remember without looking, if the cap seal is protected well enough by the cap. That cylinder lock is commonly used as a safety precaution when working on a raised bucket, and I noticed that he refers to one on each cylinder-good idea. My skid loader and combine header lock use only one, but the machines are parked while using the lock. My other thought on Greg's idea is I would remove the bucket and run with the arms lower- wouldn't even notice the frame was on the tractor, just like on my 3020 and 148 loader. His trip bucket could be removed with two pins, just as easy as the quik-tach on mine. I used to dump the bucket and frame before I got the quik-tach.

Replies:

Add a Reply Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]