Re: 4320 vs 4020

Posted by David in MD on January 04, 2007 at 05:01:06 from (199.145.20.224):

In Reply to: 4320 vs 4020 posted by Raleigh Boulware on January 03, 2007 at 11:03:50:

We used a pair of 4320"s, one as a loader tractor, and the other as a tillage tractor for years. Main complaint was they both were hard starting and when worked hard would run hot. Also broke the front end out of the loader tractor once. The 4320 is bigger and isn"t as handy getting around as the 4020. Given the choice for an all around chore tractor I"d take the 4020 but a 4320 may be quite a bit cheaper and there really isn"t anything wrong with them. Might want to look for a 30 series which would have a heavier front end, wet clutch, and possibly quad range.

Replies:

Add a Reply Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]