Re: Why Not An IH 2+2 ?

Posted by glennster on December 01, 2006 at 09:33:31 from (68.252.104.20):

In Reply to: Why Not An IH 2+2 ? posted by davpal on November 30, 2006 at 23:44:18:

i read somewhere the 2+2 was one of the downfalls of i-h. apparently, the machinery used to build the tractor was out dated and pretty much wore out. machine work was out of tolerance causeing premature failure. the tractor itself, design wise was good, but the craftmanship left something to be desired. similarly, like the 560 when it came out, the rear end was not strong enough for the power the tractor developed and caused major recalls.

Replies:

Add a Reply Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]