|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Reason for my electronics 101 question
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by KEB on October 26, 2006 at 08:57:01 from (192.91.171.36):
In Reply to: Reason for my electronics 101 question posted by MMB on October 26, 2006 at 06:36:24:
Hi, while Bob's calculations are correct, assuming the full 6 volts is applied to the field resistor is not. With the resistor in the circuit, the field winding and the external resistor are in series. Assuming 4 amps at 7 volts (roughly the charging voltage) with the field grounded, the resistance of the field winding is about 1.75 ohms. Putting that in series with the 3.3 ohm external resistor gives a field resistance of a little over 5 ohms. At 7 volts and 5 ohms, the current through the series combination of the external resistor and the field winding is about 1.4 amps. 1.4 amps squared x 3.3 ohms gives about 6.5 watts being dissipated in the series resistor. 6.5 watts is pretty consistent with the size of the orignal wire wound resistor. A 10 watt resistor can't dissipate the full 10 watts inside the switch housing (they're rated in free air at a particular temperature) without overheating, but should be able to dissipate 6 or 7 watts just fine. I'd go ahead and use the 10 watt resistor. If you're concnered, go to a slightly higher value, say 5 ohms. Under these same conditions, the current through the resistor would be a shade over an amp, and the resistor would dissipate about 5 watts. Since the output of the generator is directly proportional to the current through the field winding, the output current from the generator would be reduced by about 40% compared to a 3.3 ohm resistor, but should still maintain the battery without any problems. Keith (Electrical Engineer, 30+ years experience)
Replies:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
Talk of the Town: Best Tractor? - by Staff. This recent discussion on the Tractor Talk discussion board here at the on-line magazine drew quite a bit of response. We see the question of "Which tractor is best for me?" asked quite often. We thought you might find the responses interesting. As always, the names of the people participating in the discussion have been left out - we did not request their permission to reprint their names in this article. However you can find this discussion in it's entirety in the Tractor Talk archives.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1958 FORD RARE 4x4 801 TRACTOR, ELENCO/FRONT DRIVE, FRONTLOADER AND WEIGHTED REAR WHEELS, FIVE SPEED, LIVE PTO, GAS ENGINE, NEW REAR WHEELS AND TIRES, ENGINE RUNS.
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|