|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: the new diesel?
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by NC Wayne on August 09, 2006 at 22:38:46 from (64.12.116.74):
In Reply to: the new diesel? posted by bill from MA on August 09, 2006 at 19:08:04:
I'm not sure how far back the online version of diesel progress goes so far as reading past articles but in the print version there have been articles for some time now concerning the new Ultra low sulfur fuel. It's basically like one post said, the higher sulfur content of the current on highway fuel tends to cause premature plugging of the DPF's (diesel fuel particulate filters) used with the new engines. The EPA requires a minimum of 150,000 miles before the first ash removal but if damaged and in need of replacement a new DPF is estimated to run in the $5000-7000 range. Add to that the real problems for the consumer in that it has a lower BTU content than todays #2 duel and is expected to reduce MPG around 2% along with being say 5 to 10 cents more expensive and there you have it. For one large trucking company this reduced MPG is expected to cost them nearly 8 million a year, not including the cost increase of the fuel...and we thing we have rpoblems...according to the article in this months issue. As far as the availability of the "regular" stuff, ULDS will be the only fuel permitted by 2010. In the end it all boils down to the EPA doing what's looks good on paper for the environment, if everybody could afford or wanted to own a brand new vehicles every year, but not really seeing or caring about the real world consequenses of their rules as applied to the rest of us....Just my .02.
Replies:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
Tractor Profile: Ferguson TO-20 - by Staff. When the infamous "Handshake Agreement" between Henry Ford and Harry Ferguson fell by the wayside (that's a story in itself), Harry Ferguson quickly set up manufacturing plants for a United States version of his English TE-20. The TO-20 was relatively the same as the TE-20 except utilized some different casting materials and had a US-style electrical system. The TO-20 was a dead ringer for the Ford 9N and 2N models and they say that Ferguson did this on purpose when the Handshake Agreement wen
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1 SD Gibson, 1 D Model needs rear end assembled and installed, 1 D Model needs minor repairs, extra parts
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|