|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: OT. Lightning rod ???
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by RAB on June 17, 2006 at 09:34:02 from (195.93.21.42):
In Reply to: Re: OT. Lightning rod ??? posted by Illinois Boy on June 17, 2006 at 07:22:25:
Illinois Boy, Thanks. Yes, I know I am right. Just try to draw a spark potential on a Van der Graaf generator with a sharp, grounded conductor close to the sphere. You can"t get more than a feeble spark, if that, if the humidity is high. Try with a similar sized sphere as the ground link and you should be able to draw a high potential spark across the gap. Just like lightning. Look at the post. It says protector not preventer. Nobody needs to put a "new" hole (whatever that might be - always use old ones myself, or maybe it"s just "a hole") in a roof. Nobody needs to put a lightning rod on their house. Their choice. Their choice if it is there at all, their choice if it is on the roof or a separate pole. Their choice. Having been involved in an industry using tons (yes, tons) of explosives, we HAD to have a lightning protector on the explosives magazine. Our 300ft chimneys also HAD to have lightning protection rods. They (the chimneys) did get strikes and the magazine never once. It has long been a proven technology to prevent or minimise lightning damage. Your industry with the well insulated cables will, of course pick up capacitive high voltage spikes from a nearby strike or worse from a direct hit. Yes, the voltage will affect devices distant from the point and your damaged devices may well cause fires in adjacent buildings to the strike by destroying very sensitive ICs and the like in the electronics of telecoms devices. Yes, if there were no phone lines there would be fewer house fires. Yes, if there were no power lines there would be fewer fires. I could go on, but I think you should be able to see there is a use for lightning rods, even if they will not prevent all catastrophes. RAB
Replies:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
12-Volt Conversions for 4-Cylinder Ford 2000 & 4000 Tractors - by Tommy Duvall. After two summers of having to park my old 1964 model 4000 gas 4 cyl. on a hill just in case the 6 volt system, for whatever reason, would not crank her, I decided to try the 12 volt conversion. After some research of convert or not, I decided to go ahead, the main reason being that this tractor was a working tractor, not a show tractor (yet). I did keep everything I replaced for the day I do want to restore her to showroom condition.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1958 FORD RARE 4x4 801 TRACTOR, ELENCO/FRONT DRIVE, FRONTLOADER AND WEIGHTED REAR WHEELS, FIVE SPEED, LIVE PTO, GAS ENGINE, NEW REAR WHEELS AND TIRES, ENGINE RUNS.
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|