|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: What's wrong with Chevy/GMC diesel pickups?
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by jdemaris on January 12, 2006 at 05:45:02 from (66.218.11.236):
In Reply to: Re: What's wrong with Chevy/GMC diesel pickups? posted by Bob on January 11, 2006 at 21:29:22:
I've worked on many light-duty 94s that have mechancial injection with the DB2-4911 Roosamaster/Stanadyne pump. But . . . I don't know if they were original or replacement/repairs. When G.M. began using the electronically controlled pumps in 94,there were so many failures that many repair shops simply converted them back to full mechanical. The military vehicles still use the mechanical and still use the 6.5. Those diesel Hummers over in Irag aren't using Isuzu diesels. Another company is making the 6.5 engines now. As I recall, G.M. didn't know what to do with the early pump failures since it was - more-or-less a warranty problem with Stanadyne/Roosamaster. So - for quite a while the alledged "fix" was to replace the entire pump - which was rediculous. And, it seemed that, at first, the replacement electronic pumps were no better than the originals. If somebody had to spend "out of pocket", in my opinon, the money was better spent on installing the fully mechanical setup. You can buy a rebuilt DB2 mechancial pump in the $400 range, but the electronic DS4 is often over a $1000. Seems there was a class-action lawsuit against G.M. and Stanadyne, but I don't know what became of it. Those trucks with the electronic pumps still have mechanical indirect injection - it's just the pump that is electronically controlled. Ford had the transition from IDI to DI in 94 which I also find confusing. I've seen some 94s with both so I don't know when the change was official.
Replies:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
Experimental Tractors Article - by Danny Bowes (Dsl). Tractor technology appears to have nearly hit it's pinnacle of development. If you agreed with the subtitle, you are rather mistaken. Quite, actually. As a matter of fact, some of the technology experimented with over 40 years ago makes today's tractor technology seem absolutely stale by comparison. Experimentation, from the most complex assembly to the most simple and mundane component, is as an integral a part of any farm tractor's development
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
For sale Farmall super A tractor is complete and has just been setting for awhile,it was running when pulled out of the barn,shouldn’t take to much to get it going asking 1100.00
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|