Re: Supreme Court Ruling

Posted by Red Dave on June 24, 2005 at 06:16:02 from (24.104.94.34):

In Reply to: Supreme Court Ruling posted by K-Mo on June 24, 2005 at 05:05:45:

Before you spout off you ought to at least learn a little bit about what you're talking about.

This is a case of government confiscating private property to turn it over to a developer just so the property can generate more tax revenue. it's about eminent domain, a power of government, not business. Sure the developer will make money, but that isn't why it was done. It was pure and simply a tax increase scheme by the town of New London CT.

This ruling means that anybody can lose their property if government thinks there is more tax money available from somebody else having it.

This is a hideous mis-carriage of justice. No one's home is safe now.

We need more judges who will follow the constitution instead of ignoring it.

Not a single justice on this court was a nomination of George W. Bush, yet you take this as an opportunity to bash him. What does that say about you?

Check out who voted for this and who voted against it.

• Read Here

Follow Ups:

• Re: Supreme Court Ruling Bill Rolland 09:30:33 06/24/05 (0)

Post a Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]