|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: C.R.P.
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Paul in Mich on May 06, 2005 at 13:06:44 from (205.188.117.74):
In Reply to: Re: C.R.P. posted by paul on May 06, 2005 at 07:09:39:
Paul, It depends on how a particular piece of land affects the ecosystem as to whether a particular program is designed to enhance the wildlife habitat, affect the watershed, retard errosion, maintain wetlands etc. Not long ago, a county adjacent to ours was offering, in partnership with State and federal conservation programs, a conservation program to promote no-till, in areas that no-till could influence the watershed. Our county was not part of the program,, however it was on the county line and part of the other county"s watershed. Since it involved nearly 1,800 acres, they extended the program to the land in our county. The no-till committment had to be for a 10 year period of time. Unless a farmer is set up for no-till, it is an expensive switchover. The program allowed farmers to make the switch with a minimal outlay of capital on their part. I"m not advocating or criticizing the use of tax payers dollars to fund such programs, but I will say that if we can fund the endowment for the arts, we, as taxpayers can partially fund no-till research. Some of these conservation programs do benifit the public at large, not just a select group. Conservation is a totally separate issue from environmentalism, whicn if about everything but the environment. As a farmer, I would not volunteer a square foot of my farmland as a wildlife refuge, a wildflower sanctuary, or wetlands reclaimation, as I strongly question the legitimacy and motive of such programs. Soil conservation, wind and water errosion, watershed issues, land management, reforresting in selected areas, are real and legitimate issues.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
A Lifetime of David Brown - by Samuel Kennedy. I was born in 1950 and reared on my family�s 100 acre farm. It was a fairly typical Northern Ireland farm where the main enterprise was dairying but some pigs, poultry and sheep were also kept. Potatoes were grown for sale and oats were grown to be used for cattle and horse feeding. Up to about 1958 the dairy cows were fed hay with some turnips and after that grass silage was the main winter feed. That same year was the last in which flax was grown on the farm. Flax provided the fibre which w
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
2555 Mahindra Shuttle 4x4 heat,air,diesel,7ft Mahindra heavy duty bushhog 7ft snowblade bucket
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|