|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Woops - meant Hole Theory - not Hall Theory
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by jdemaris on April 24, 2005 at 06:24:08 from (209.23.29.219):
In Reply to: Re: Woops - meant Hole Theory - not Hall Theory posted by dr.sportster on April 24, 2005 at 05:56:26:
Yes, I agree. There are many cases where it seems flow has been observed in both directions. But, there is no absolute standard. I have noticed, that some people believe, due to what we regard as our modern day advanced technology, we have a handle on stuff around us. But, it's more like - the more we know, the less we know. Newtonian laws were believed by many to be the standared until some of Albert Einstein's ideas partly expressed in his "Special Theory of Relativity" were tested and proven. So, now we have Newtonian versus that of Quantum Physics. Sub-atominc particles going in the wrong directions, seeming to defy gravity, black holes in outer space with no apparent mass but huge gravitational pulls, etc. Then we have all these titles for things we've never seen - like the vector of tranmission of light and gravity (photons and gravitons). Next time you see high tide caused by the moon's pull, please show me the gravitons.
So, what the heck do I know? I must admit, I've never seen an electron or a graviton. If I drive my car at the speed of light, will the headlights still work? Modern science often attempts to explain away the unexplainable with titles.
Back to the negative ground versus postive ground. One had to be chosen so there would be a standard - it was NOT done because of any observed advantage.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
What Oil Should I Use? - by Francis Robinson. I keep seein this question pop up over and over again in discussion groups all over the web. As with many things there are often several right answers and a few wrong ones. Some purist I'm sure will disagree to no end with what I will tell you but most of us out here in the real world don't really care do we ? Some of them only bring their noses down out of the air long enough to look down them anyway. If you are like me you are only doing this old tractor stuff because you enjoy it. You
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2025 Yesterday's Tractor Co.
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|
