|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: OT-Vortec 4.3 improvements over regular4.3
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by jdemaris on February 22, 2005 at 20:13:17 from (209.23.30.42):
In Reply to: OT-Vortec 4.3 improvements over regular4.3 posted by DCM on February 22, 2005 at 19:39:40:
Vortec is supposed to have better low-end torque and better mileage, partly due to the more direct injection of fuel. I don't believe the better mileage claim. Early 94 engines and older 4.3s have throttle body injection, then for around two years -starting in 94 CPI was used, then CSFI. CPI still uses one central injector like TBI does, but uses separate hoses that run to each port. It also uses a high-pressure 60 PSI fuel system unlike TBI. It is expensive to fix and is replaced as a unit. The later CSFI has a separate injector for each port and has some replaceble parts and is less trouble prone than the CPI. I had a 92 TBI 4.3 Blazer, I have a 94 AWD Astrovan AWD 4.3 with CPI, and two of my sons have 2000 Blazers with 4.3s with CSFI. My older 92 non-Vortec 4.3 Blazer with TBI averaged 14 MPG in the winter in all around driving and got around 19 on the highway under the best conditions. My 94 Astrovan with the 4.3 CPI system gets 14 MPG average and 18 highway, and both of my sons' 2000 Blazers with the CSFI 4.3s are averaging 12 MPG and 18 highway in winter driving. So, I haven't seen any whopping differences in mileage, and I haven't noticed a power increase either. If anything, the mileage has been a little worse with the newer Vortecs. I live in a hilly area, maybe the gains would be different in highway/flatland driving. I will say that all the 4.3s have been more powerful and slightly better in fuel than my 86 Blazer with the 2.8 TBI was. My 6.2 diesel Blazers both will get around 21 MPG on the highway and 16-17 around town, so that beats all the Vortec Blazers.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
Machine Shops - by Curtis Von Fange. It is a story that repeats itself countless times. In the process of rebuilding a particular section of the tractor there is a broken part for which a replacement cannot be found. The parts houses find in their catalogue that it is unavailable. The dealerships call it a discontinued part. Salvage yards define it as hard to find or, even worse, rare. Everyone on the NET says, 'what is it?' But don�t despair there is another avenue that can be used to get that piece repaired. The local mach
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1 SD Gibson, 1 D Model needs rear end assembled and installed, 1 D Model needs minor repairs, extra parts
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|