|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Ammeters vs Voltmeters ???
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by jdemaris on December 12, 2004 at 19:09:32 from (209.23.31.233):
In Reply to: Re: Ammeters vs Voltmeters ??? posted by Rod (NH) on December 12, 2004 at 07:40:43:
The "guru" mentioned in the article you linked to, makes a few errors. First of all, an ammeter does NOT have to carry full charge current - he is absolutely wrong. It is a common practice, especially in automobiles, to use shunt-ammeters. This type of ammeter measures votage drop across a small shunt bar and is hooked with small wires that do NOT carry high current. Further, for him to state "there is no chance for misinterpreting a voltmeter's readings as can happen with an ammeter" is a little silly. Anything can be misinterpreted, nothing is foolproof, and there are definite advantages and disadvantages to both instruments. That's why I like having both. A voltmeter will not instantly tell you there is an exceptionally high draw on the electrical system when the engine is not running; a ammeter will - e.g. like leaving the lights on by accident. A voltmeter will not tell you your overloaded system is at a discharge every time the engine is idled down like an ammeter will - unless you have a VERY accurate voltmeter and a small battery. Most automotive voltmeters are somewhat vague and most batteries are large enough so they act a buffers to fast readings. On the other hand, a voltmeter is nice since it will report battery condition before the engine is running which an ammeter will not. But, even this can be misleading since, if there is a draw on the system, the volt reading might be an indicator of some other problem like excess current draw - which an ammeter would tell you right away.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
Tractor Profile: Oliver 70 Row Crop - by Staff. The Oliver 70 was part of the "Fleetline Series" and was manufacturered from 1937 to 1948. The row-crop configuration could have either dual or single front wheels. The Oliver 70 was also offered in the standard, orchard and industrial configurations. The tractors were sold in Canada. An early advertisement states "Power when you want it - power when you need it - power to help put in crops when field conditions are right and time and help are limited. That's the power you'll find in an Oliv
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
Late 50s early 60s international harvester 560 with cultivator
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|