|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Benefits of higher compression?.
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Neil on June 26, 2004 at 16:45:30 from (138.88.15.38):
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Benefits of higher compression?. posted by Ron on June 26, 2004 at 12:27:09:
Well, it sounds like we're largely in agreement over the objective factors, but maybe differ on the subjective aspect of what's "best." And the fact that we can differ on what's best is what makes this country great. I definitely understand your point about bang for the buck. It's pretty darn cheap to have the head milled or put an lp head on or swap out pistons. And it's generally less troublesome indeed than forced induction. I, however, come from the "no replacement for displacement" school. In my opinion, there's no better way to add low end torque than to add cubes. Yes, as far as the cost of parts and machine work goes, it's more expensive than a compression ratio increase. But, if you use the tractor for more than a few tractor pulls a year, you would want to factor in any additional cost for higher octane gas. With fuel costs factored in, one can imagine that there are certainly situations in which boring or stroking would be more cost effective than a CR bump. Of course, in the case of most antique tractors the compression ratio can be raised from the factory level without requiring any upgrade in fuel. In that case it most certainly makes sense to increase the CR at least to the point where it is as high as it can go without needing to upgrade fuel. At the end of the day I suppose it's all a matter of personal preference as to how one prefers to waste one's money. ;-)
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
The Engine Rebuild Kit - by Curtis Von Fange. I always liked engine rebuild kits. They have all the replacement parts for overhauling an engine without going to the store to get gaskets, special measuring tools, or miscellaneous parts. They come neatly packaged, clean and tidy. But it's important not to let that packaging lull you into a false sense of security. The appearance of matching sleeves, pistons, rings, and bearings can cause frustration and agony if not properly measured and installed in a workshop environment. Following c
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
one 8n and one 9n tractor. totaly restored,pretty much everything is new. one 6ft blade good shape.
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co.
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|
