|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: True or False.... Ft/Lbs.
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Rod (NH) on December 03, 2003 at 16:18:51 from (12.148.160.138):
In Reply to: True or False.... Ft/Lbs. posted by Just Curious on December 03, 2003 at 14:03:04:
Hi Just Curious, Odd name you got there :o). Here's another opinion. There is no valid term as ft/lb. What I think you mean is ft-lb which is an energy term. It represents a force acting THROUGH a distance on an object. Despite common usage, ft-lb is NOT a term that properly designates torque. Torque is a force acting AT a distance on an object not THROUGH a distance. Big difference. To acknowledge that difference, torque is properly termed as lb-ft and not ft-lb. The samples you provide develop an energy (kinetic energy) of 200 ft-lb and 300 ft-lb respectively. Weight times height. This is not a force. The actual force that is developed when the weight lands depends entirely on the relative stiffness of the weight and whatever the weight lands on. That amount of energy has to be dissipated (usually by deformation of one or both objects) upon landing in order to bring the weight to rest. Extremely high forces can be developed when hard weights land on hard surfaces. A steel cannon ball on a concrete surface for instance. In comparison, the force developed by that same cannon ball when landing on a pile of modelling clay would be much less due to the relative ease of deformation of the clay. The above is true if one neglects the effects of any change of gravity with height and the resistance of the air. Both are negligeable in the context of your question, I believe. Rod
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
A Farmall Story - by Ed Meadors. The year was 1978. Our young family had recently moved to rural Chesapeake, Virginia to a plot of land which would finally allow us to realize our dreams of a huge garden, critters and more lawn and pasture than we would ever use! We needed a TRACTOR; not a riding mower or tractor wannabe, but a real TRACTOR. The answer to our needs materialized in the form of a '44 Farmall A, complete with cultivators, discs, single plow, a 5ft.Woods belly mower and one, mounted spare 9.00x24 rear wheel.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
one 8n and one 9n tractor. totaly restored,pretty much everything is new. one 6ft blade good shape.
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|