Re: Case 1030

Posted by Bob Clark on June 13, 2003 at 17:01:39 from (24.154.96.80):

In Reply to: Case 1030 posted by dhermesc on June 12, 2003 at 07:46:48:

About the 1030, the bottom end of the engine is somewhat different than the 70 series but not an issue. As for the rest of the drive train I'd rate as about as rugged as any thing built in it's day. The hydralics were a problem because they were low volume and a little dated in design. This problem stayed with the Case line until the 90 series with the closed center system.

The pto problems with the 70 series were caused by the way the engineers designed the oil feed for the transmission, pto, brakes and steering. Using a 70 series to power high power moving pto equipement would try anyones patience. Pushing the clutch pedal or sometimes using the power shift would cause a pulse as the transmission control valve diverted oil and make the pto drop for an instant. You wouldn't see it but you could feel it and most likly any shear pins in you chopper, sheller, combine ... would too. I've dealt with many irate farmers on service calls over this problem and there was never a good fix.

Follow Ups:

Post A Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Re: Re: Case 1030 Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]