Re: Narrow, cheaper than wide end?

Posted by Dave 2n on April 03, 2003 at 11:58:36 from (152.163.188.71):

In Reply to: Narrow, cheaper than wide end? posted by Bernhard on April 02, 2003 at 12:20:11:

My hobby is collecting and restoring the prevalent tractors of the late 40's and 50's, the ones that I saw and used during my "formative years." Around here, those tractors were NF's with the exception of Ford N's.

I did not and will not tell anyone else what to get for a tractor any more than I would want them to tell me what to get. In the previous posts, I didn't tell anyone to get a NF tractor. I simply reacted to those who spouted blanket utterances that all NF's were unsafe, unless you used them in the middle of a flat and level Interstate. I then conveyed my experience wityh NF's, stating that if used with care and forethought, they were safe on hilly ground. If you read my posts, you will see that I was reacting to the group who attacks the safety of NF tractors without good reason and without having had experience with these tractors.

So-I stand by my contention that many of the biggest critics of NF's re: safety are the "theory and formula" guys and/or people who have never worked with NF tractors on hills.

Have a good day, everyone, and support our President, our country and our troops.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Re: Narrow, cheaper than wide end? Dave_ 12:28:13 04/03/03 (0)

Post A Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Re: Re: Narrow, cheaper than wide end? Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]