Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Narrow, cheaper than wide end?


[ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Deas Plant. on April 03, 2003 at 02:06:24 from (210.50.56.201):

In Reply to: Narrow, cheaper than wide end? posted by Bernhard on April 02, 2003 at 12:20:11:

Hi, Folks.
I have wondered for a while at the apparent fondness for narrow-front - 'tricycle' - tractors in the U.S.. I knew they were more manouvreable, and suspected that they were basically designed for row-crop applications but it never dawned on me that they might be cheaper to produce.

The main reason for my wonder though was the question of stability and I thought Paul Janke summed it up very well in his post. He put my thoughts into words exactly. I have no doubt that there are some ardent fans of the narrow-front configuration who will not like hearing it but, given the same track on the rear axle and same size rear tires, a wide-front will always be more stable than a narrow-front purely and simply because of the lower center of gravity. On top of this, many narrow-fronts that I see pictured in U.S. sites and in magazines seem to have larger diameter, narrower tires that similar-sized wide-front tractors. All for a purpose, I guess.

Having said that, I would NEVER knock anybody's personal choice of narrow or wide front. For mine anybody has the right to choose whatever tractor they desire, warts and all.

Row crops are not as common here in Australia, to the extent that I can only definitely remember seeing ONE narrow-front tractor 'in the flesh' so to speak, and perhaps two or three others in 'for sale' adverts in my life time to date. The bulk of the tractor market here would be for broad-acre use for cereal crops, etc. and they are almost without exception, wide-fronts.

Even market gardeners and orchardists here use wide-fronts. Most of our market gardening areas are relatively flat but there are some rather wrinkly, 'well-drained' orchard areas.

I also can not remember ever seeing an Australian tractor fitted with the narrow - 'bicycle' - rear tires that I see on many pictures of American narrow-front tractors. Would these narrow rear tires also be a row-crop feature?

Let the debate rage -- peacefully, please.

You have a winderful day. Best wishes. Deas Plant.




Follow Ups:




Post A Followup

:
:

: Re: Re: Narrow, cheaper than wide end?

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Field Modifications (Sins of the Farmer) - by Staff. Picture a new Chevrolet driving down the street without it's grill, right fender and trunk lid. Imagine a crude hole made in the hood to accommodate a new taller air cleaner, the fender wells cut away to make way for larger tires, and half of a sliding glass door used to replace the windshield. Top that off with an old set of '36 Ford headlight shells bolted to the hood. Pretty unlikely for a car... but for a tractor, this is pretty normal. It seems that more often than not they a ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy