Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Shipping container


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by TomIn on December 19, 2018 at 03:09:17 from (23.118.149.246):

In Reply to: Re: Shipping container posted by Geo-TH,In on December 18, 2018 at 03:57:03:

George,

Your assessed value increased from $146,200 (2017 assessment/2018 pay) to $152,000 (2018 assessment/2019 pay). It is likely that your taxes will go up, but the amount of change depends on what the tax rate will be. Remember that the taxes you pay on your lot and your "main" home are calculated based on the net assessed value and the local tax rate. The taxes you pay on the garage with an attached apartment are based on the 2% property tax cap rate. The 2018 assessment figures were before you combined your two lots, and I don't know what effect this will have.

The 9% I mentioned is a another of the complications in the Indiana property tax appraisal system. I will do my best to explain.

Prior to about 15 years ago (I forget the exact year) assessed value of improvements (buildings) was the depreciated replacement value. This means the cost to build a substantially similar building - less a reduction for the affects of aging. This often meant that owners of older homes paid far less property tax than owners of newer homes with the same market value. Someone filed a lawsuit and the courts decided that this system was unconstitutional. The courts required the state to change their assessments to market value.

It isn't practical (because of the time and cost involved) to appraise every building every year. In lieu of this, the state adopted a plan that used the existing data that had been collected and created a formula to "convert" the depreciated replacement values into market values. They did this by requiring all sales of property to be reported and a data base was created. Every year they total the "market value sales" (they ignore the sales where a parent deeds his house to a relative for a small sum and forced foreclosure sales) in a given neighborhood. The total value of building sold is calculated by subtracting the total of assessed values of the land from the total of the sales. They then divide the total of the sales prices of buildings by the total of the assessed values of the buildings. The result is the "market value adjustment". For your neighborhood, this is 109%. This means that every building in your neighborhood will be assessed at 109% of it's depreciated replacement cost. If you build a new building, it will be assessed at 109% of the cost (using the cost tables I mentioned in another post).

Whether this system is fair is a whole different discussion. In my opinion, the system is reasonable if all the buildings in the neighborhood are of similar character and age AND IF THE ASSESSOR'S INFORMATION IS CORRECT. Quite often this isn't the case.


Replies:




Add a Reply!
You must be Logged In to Post


:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

No political comments, hate speech or bigotry of any kind will be tolerated. Violations will be removed and posting privileges may be permanently revoked without notice.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial No List 
Return to Post 
Upload Photos/Videos
Upload one or more videos to your post. Photo and video filesizes should be less than 5MB. Formats allowed are gif, jpg, png, ogg, mp4, mov, and avi. Be sure to use filenames without spaces or special characters, and filetypes of 3 digits lower case.

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - The Nuts and Bolts of Fasteners - Part 2 - by Curtis Von Fange. In our previous article we discussed capscrews, bolts, and nuts along with their relative hardness and thread sizes. In this segment we will finish up on our fasteners and then work with ways to keep them from loosening up in the field. Capscrews, bolts and nuts are not the only means of holding two parts together. When dealing with thinner metals like sheet tin, a long bolt and ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Oliver 550 Diesel runs like a watch three point hitch pto engine gone threw about two hundred hours ago nice clean tractor [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy