OK, I completely agree with stopping untraceable money transfers.
But I see several problems with the call issue.
1. The do not call list. In a sense that did work. I know of 3 "call centers" in our area (within 30 or so miles in a rural area) that closed. But there were loop holes too. Such as allowing any business that you had given your number to, to call. That included any affiliates of said company. I never used the do not call list and the number of telemarketers calling me has dropped to almost 0.
2. Those laws only apply to call centers located IN the US. So basically all that did was make Americans lose jobs. Now they can call from Canada, Mexico, India or any other country. Nothing to stop that and it's not the phone companies fault. No way yo impose our laws on other countries unless we invade and take control of said country.
3. Limiting calls or barring phone cloaking software? One of my daughter in laws is an office manager for a medical insurance company. One that sells some insurance through the exchanges. They have several call centers around the US making "300" calls a minute. But they are calls to people making sure they got their insurance cards and understand their policies. You want to bar legitimate calls? How is the phone company supposed to know without illegally listening in on calls? You want someone monitoring your calls? That is also why the cloaking devices can't be stopped. They would have to monitor calls to know that one was being used.
Don't get me wrong. I'd like to see this stopped too but I'm not willing to surrender any of my rights to do it. Every time you put up a roadblock to stop these con artist they will in short order find a way around it. I think scamming people is the world 2nd oldest profession.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Ford Part Number Trivia - by Forum Participants. "Replaced by" means the part was superseded. All of my part books date back to 1964 and New Holland have changed some part numbers. They usually put the old Ford part number on the package. I was suppressed when I looked up the part number of the auxiliary drive shaft because for some reason the part number went through a radical change and it lost its "Basic Part Number". Ford part numbers follow the following rules. Most part numbers are in three parts. The middle part is called the
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.