I don't have any articles (on hand that I have saved) but based soley on my experience and literature Ive ran across over the years, I believe its less critical on a battery powered coil ignition (as to the use of wire core versus higher resistance carbon core wires) then it is on a generally lower energy magneto ignition. I read somewhere that in general, based on RPM and magnetic field strength of the rotor, and based on the impedance of the load into which the mags output is connected, ITS BEST IF THE LOAD (part of which is the plug wires) IS LOWER IMPEDANCE and wire is less impedance then carbon.
Subject to RPM and magnetic field strength (on a mag) its my understanding in general a typical old tractor mag produces less energy then a battery powered old tractor ignition and since plug wire current yields I Squared R heat energy losses its NOT good to waste any limited precious spark energy in the wires but best to discharge it all across the plug gap.
If the energy is limited to begin with, and the mag is less energy then a battery ignition, why waste any in the form of I Squared R heat loss in higher resistance plug wires??????????
NOTE I know Ive read this before and didn't dream it lol but its my belief wire core wire is best to use on a Magneto (because energy is limited so why waste any in the wires), although sure, either will still work well duhhhhhhh but I just dont have any hard core research or articles Ive saved to cite to back that up
That's my story n Ima stickin to it for now at least lol but Ive been wrong before you know
Upload one or more videos to your post. Photo filesizes should be less than 300K and Videos, less than 2MB. Formats allowed are gif, jpg, png, ogg, mp4, mov, and avi. Be sure to use filenames without spaces or special characters, and filetypes of 3 digits lower case.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Restoration Story: 1929 McCormick-Deering 10-20 - by Randal Simmon. On July 4th 1998 my dad and I was sitting on the front porch when he said that he was going to sell his two 10-20's to a junk man. He said that the junk man was going to give him $500 for both of them but he hadn't received the money for them yet. So I went into the house and wrote him a check for $500 and bought them myself and said now they are mine. He had bought them about five years before thinking that he was going to restore them himself. After five years sitting in the barn, he changed h
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1 SD Gibson, 1 D Model needs rear end assembled and installed, 1 D Model needs minor repairs, extra parts
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
