Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: RE;JD Seller origin of closed center hyd's.


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by JD Seller on September 04, 2014 at 17:32:52 from (208.126.198.123):

In Reply to: RE;JD Seller origin of closed center hyd's. posted by Tx Jim on September 04, 2014 at 11:12:19:

TxJIm I don't know how you jump to where I said the closed center system was German designed.

I NEVER SAID THAT THE closed center system was a GERMAN design feature. I did SAY THAT the 20 series utility tractor was Mannheim influenced and leaned toward THEIR "new" design over the Dubuque engineer's design.

JD Corporate put out that they wanted a "new" utility tractor that did not have the 10 series problems. This was in 1962 or 63. Waterloo, Dubuque, and Mannheim ALL worked on design proposals for the "new" 20 series JD utility tractor. Some general requirements included a closed center hydraulic system. So all three design locations included that feature. Eventually Waterloo and Dubuque engineering was combined in Dubuque for the utility tractors.

The Dubuque tractor design proposal was slightly different than the Mannheim design proposal. They both had the closed center hydraulic system but they differed in PTO, driveline and chassis design. JD corporate chose the Mannheim design as the one they wanted to refine. So then both locations of engineers worked on the final tractor.

My friend always maintained that the Waterloo/Dubuque designed tractor was a simpler one. One of the differences he told me was the internal steel lines. The Mannheim designed tractor had them the Dubuque designed tractor had the external lines like the larger Waterloo row crop tractors.

You need to understand some internal JD cooperate politics too. The New generation Row crop tractors where such a hit that really gained JD market share. Then compare the 10 series utility tractors being subpar when compared to the row crop tractors. JD Cooperate knew they had an issue with the utility tractor line. The "blame" landed on the Dubuque engineering department. So when the "new" JD utility tractors where being designed the Dubuque engineering department got the cold shoulder treatment so to speak.

All of this is from years of talking with my friend. HE should have been in the "know". When he retired he was the number two man in the engineering department in Dubuque. He always felt that JD cooperate laid the blame for the 10 series problems on the Dubuque Department only. Never mind that JD cooperate did not give them the time or money the row crop guys had in Waterloo, to design a 10 series utility tractor.

So here is what he felt happened with the entire utility tractor design and manufacturing. When the draft proposals of the 20 series utility tractor where presented to JD cooperate, the Mannheim design proposal was chosen over the Dubuque one. Then both departments worked on the final design. Here is where he was kind of bitter. He claimed that an idea/change out of the Dubuque department was rarely seriously considered. The Mannheim department's ideas faced less resistance.

You need to understand that the utility tractor market was larger over seas than it was here. JD cooperate talked about moving the utility tractor manufacturing over to Germany when the 20 series came out.

So it is NOT just one feature that was US or Mannheim. Its just that the JD, 20 series through the 55 series, utility tractor was mainly Mannheim controlled/influenced.

I have always maintained that the JD utility tractor was not in the league of the row crop tractors. The JD utility tractors always had a complicated hydraulic system that was a real pain to repair when something went wrong.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - The Nuts and Bolts of Fasteners - Part 2 - by Curtis Von Fange. In our previous article we discussed capscrews, bolts, and nuts along with their relative hardness and thread sizes. In this segment we will finish up on our fasteners and then work with ways to keep them from loosening up in the field. Capscrews, bolts and nuts are not the only means of holding two parts together. When dealing with thinner metals like sheet tin, a long bolt and ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Oliver 550 Diesel runs like a watch three point hitch pto engine gone threw about two hundred hours ago nice clean tractor [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy