Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Reese drum Mower


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by picassomcp on May 30, 2014 at 11:53:43 from (50.124.216.146):

In Reply to: Re: Reese drum Mower posted by jhilyer on May 30, 2014 at 10:31:08:

Thanks for your real world experience on this set up. The biggest reason for me leaning toward the 8 foot machine is productivity. I understand that I can drive as fast as I want while cutting hay with a drum mower, but I'm not sure my hayfields and meadows will allow for a lot more speed than I am going now with my 9' haybine. The 6'9" drum mower is 25% smaller in cut per pass. My first 25% in ground speed only allows me to break even in cutting time. I need to gain at least 50% in cut time to justify the expense over my current haybine. If I go with the 8' model, I won't need such an increase in speed to gain productivity.

I am concerned a bit about the weight hanging on and behind the tractor. I've removed the fluid out of my 460d tires and have done all I can to lighten the tractor to allow it to float over the fields during wet conditions. If I hang a 1250+ machine off of the back plus add weight so the tractor carries it well, then I'm back to rutting up my fields. So kind of a catch 22. I never thought of the conversion arms putting the weight even farther back there but it certainly will. I travel 9 miles to my farthest fields, I don't wanna be bouncing for 9 miles because I wanted to keep my tractor light and be overly productive.

I think I realize the 6'9" is best, but I don't wanna spend $5,000+ and be dissappointed that I bought too small of machine. I'd rather end up having to use a larger tractor if needed but still have an obvious increase in acres cut per hour.

I'm still mulling it over. If I end up unhappy about my size selection, I'm not sure that I would be able to sell it. Drum mowers just have not caught on over here. Seems everyone just has to have a darn discbine. If I do pick the correct size, I think I would have a huge smile every time I see someone with a discbine.

I wish there was a way to have a test run, but the dealer is several states away. I guess I just need to keep thinking on it, opinions still welcome.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Tractor Profile: Allis-Chalmers Model G - by Staff. The first Allis-Chalmers Model G was produced in 1948 in Gasden, Alabama, and was designed for vegetable gardeners, small farms and landscape businesses. It is a small compact tractor that came with a complete line of implements especially tailored for its unique design. It featured a rear-mounted Continental N62 four-cylinder engine with a 2-3/8 x 3-1/2 inch bore and stroke. The rear-mounted engine provided traction for the rear wheels while at the same time gave the tractor operator a gre ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Oliver 550 Diesel runs like a watch three point hitch pto engine gone threw about two hundred hours ago nice clean tractor [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy