Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Slow moving tractors and horses warning sign


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Rich_WI on October 29, 2013 at 19:21:21 from (50.50.82.205):

In Reply to: Slow moving tractors and horses warning sign posted by Bret4207 on October 29, 2013 at 04:26:58:

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

Well compairing apples to oranges you would be correct but when thinking critically about it, no, you are not correct. For example, the 80K trucks dont ever come down the rural roads that the Amish run so how can you compair them? Simple, you cant. But if you look at the better built roads that the trucks run vs. the township roads, you can easily see the heavier damage from the horses and buggies. Fair compairison? Not really because everybody knows the main roads are built heavier but would there still be damage from the horses if they did run them? Of course there would and we know that because we see it where the horses cross the main roads, the damage goes through the intersections. But like I said, not a fair compairison because if you flipped the use, the rural road would get messed up from the heavy truck more than the horse wrecking the main road. The difference is, the truck paid taxes that pays for the roads....

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

I admit I dont get out much, I only put 20,000 miles a year on my work truck and 5,000-10,000 miles on my motorcycles. Call me a homebody if you must but I have to say, I have never, EVER seen anything like you discribe. I have seen the blacktop damaged on the edge of the road when a tractor (normal tractor, not even a huge articulated one) drove on the edge of the road before the shoulder was put in or from turning off the road into a field. The road damaged on the edge is very rare and from a farmer driveing on it before the road was done, thats his fault. As for going into a field, that damage is expected and now the county puts in approaches to prevent it. Crushed culverts? Puhleese, never seen one. So with that in mind, we can simply set aside your assertions.

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

Oh yes they do. If they dont, they county sends a crew out and does it and sends a bill. The sheriff warns them first though, its not like the county has a crew sitting at the shop waiting for a call so they can boost revenue, they really dont want to do it at all but some times they have to. I learned that lesson way back in high school when some friends were mud bogging after school every day and we got a little visit from Barny Fife and he made sure we knew exactally where the bear does his buisness in the woods. As for the liquid manure, if farmer ever has 4 inches of slop on the road, he has bigger things to worry about than paying for the bobcat time, he is gonna be getting a visit from the alphabet people and they will be sampling ditches and water runoff. He wont have to worry long though, he will be out of business soon. Well, at least without an insurance carrier after that massive payout.

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

While I not big on making laws just to make them, in fact Im heavily against it but in this case, if its felt that its fair for everybody that if the Amish starting kicking in a fair share for the roads they use and abuse, I wouldnt have a huge problem with making farmers doing the same thing for tractors and impliments. The only small problem is, farmers have case history of being allowed to use the roads for farming needs, just using the roads for travel has always been a "pay to play" deal. Like I said though, if the farmers have to kick in to make things fair because the Amish start paying, Im OK with that.

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

Oh, this is my favorite, the old "taxes ala-carte" arguement. Count me in! I would love, Love, LOVEEEEE to only pay taxes on the services that I use. No arguement from me, of course thats not what we are talking about (or were). We are talking about the taxes that Amish dont pay, that was the question on the table and I clearly stated it (if I do say so myself).

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

I dont disagree with that, no different than the English.

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

Again, I agree.

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

And there you go, off the deep end....

Everybody knows you are an Amish apologist but you dont have to make it sound like the Amish do nothing wrong and harm nobody because its just not true. You also dont have to make it sould like the English are the only ones that hurt others, because it also is just not true. We dont need to get into all the crimes and ethics issues that the Amish not only let happen but seemingly approve of, do we?

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

Ironic you say that given the context of your post....


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
: :

:

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Women and Tractors - More Views From the Farmer's Wife - by Teri Burkholder. The top ten reasons why the judges wouldn't let you participate in the stock antique tractor pull: Hey, this is stock! It came with that V8 in it! That "R" on my tires stands for "really old" not radial! Blue gas? We thought it was a pretty color! What wire hooked to my throttle? ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy