Re: Farmall 560 Hydraulic ?

Posted by Hugh MacKay on January 23, 2003 at 00:28:16 from (216.208.58.164):

In Reply to: Farmall 560 Hydraulic ? posted by E MARIER on January 22, 2003 at 10:39:53:

I had a 560 with 2000 loader, and if I remember correctly a 7 foot snow bucket, and snow, sawdust, manure, etc. was the limit. Dirt bucket was about 50 inches. I always found valves on 560 very spongy, and surprisingly same valve as 300. We had the following tractors all bought new H, 300, 560 and 656. The only one to ever match the old H with the belly pump on a lift was the 656 and when 656 was new the old H was 16 years old. I never matched the two tractors up on a lift, but they were close. 300 and 560 weren't even in the same league, and never were from the day they were new.

I beleive IH toned them down on purpose, a lot of Hs broke torque tubes on loaders. It really was the full frame loader that solved that problem.

Follow Ups:

Post A Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Re: Re: Farmall 560 Hydraulic ? Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]