Re: Re: Re: Re: Width of,,,

Posted by Hugh MacKay on November 23, 2002 at 13:50:11 from (216.208.58.121):

In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Width of,,, posted by CNKS on November 23, 2002 at 12:21:15:

I never had one of these tractors set at maximum. I found that 72" centres gave a tractor the height of a Farmall good stability. I was planting in 36" rows and this meant every tractor could travel those rows. These included H, SM, 300, 560, 504 and 656. All those tractors including the H had axle near to being same width as outside of tires. As I said before my H being a 1952 had some of the upgrades seen on Super H. Those I listed in previous post. I don't know about the engine.

In 1975 I purchased a 1066 and those axles must have been close to 100" With rear wheels set on 84" centres tires were same width as axle.

Follow Ups:

Post A Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Width of,,, Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]