Re: 986 or 1086

Posted by Hugh MacKay on May 25, 2007 at 17:54:44 from (209.226.106.67):

In Reply to: Re: 986 or 1086 posted by RFIRB on May 25, 2007 at 17:08:46:

RFIRB: My experience, 1066 burnt 5 gph on round baler. 560 and 656 pulled the same baler on less than 1.5 gph and baled just as much hay per hour. At the end of the day you had baled just as much hay with the 60 hp tractors, and because they were agile and nimble not near as much hay was missed in field.

I never hooked the 1066 to my square baler, of course my square baler was old when I got the 1066, thus I figured the tractor would wreck it.

Replies:

• Re: 986 or 1086 Allan In NE 18:00:04 05/25/07 (0)

Add a Reply Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]