Brent's crazy thoughts.

Brent's crazy thoughts: last night I was looking at an old classic tractor show on the computer. Like always I watch some thing and then we think. well I started to realize I had a problem in my collection of tractors. It was not brought to my attention threw the years because I was to busy in just buying tractors. Before I got in to tractors I was a car and restoration person back in the 1980'S. then I walked in to tractors in 1990. This is a funny thought to realize that I have Three tractor in my collection that are all the same year that they where new. the year is 1950 then I started to think what cars do I own and do I have a 1950's car? Than it hit me Yes I do a 1952 Willy's CJ3A. so I guess in the 1950's I had a good year. that was a hard to do because I was not even born in those years. to realize I was not even around in the 1950'S but I still have had a good year. L.O.L.
 
I'm a 1956 vintage and so is my Series I land rover although by the vin, I'm older by a few months. Also a '52 MG TD.
cvphoto51775.jpg
 
Japan had something like that called a Land Curser with an exact copy of a Chevy 6, anyone remember them? Stan
 
They still live around Minnesota. Tough vehicles. That engine was so close, that they shared the durability and torque features of the original. Jim
 
Tractors were selling high back in the early 1990's and cars were way cheaper back in the 1980's now tractors have went way low and cars have went way way high !
 
I had the idea that they were a copy of the AMC Six, except switched from right to left.
Some claim the old Ford Six was the same as the Studebaker, except mirror imaged, too.
 
The story I heard was that Chevy had the contract to supply army vehicles during the Korean War and subcontracted Toyota to build some of them. That was how Toyota wound up with the tooling for the Chevy 235 CI 6 cylinder engine that they put in the original Land Cruiser. My high school chemistry teacher had one.
 
I really like those tuff looking Land rovers. The sad part is I could never find one of those for sale. those old land rovers where tuff things in the dirt and off road. they where know to go any where you wanted to go.
 
The real reason I left restoring cars was because of California Department new rules they had put in to place. They wanted there back fees on all the cars to be paid. they would want the buyer to pay the back fees of registration for the years that registration was not paid even if the owner never paid them up to date. That is why I left buying old junk cars and restoring them at that time. To munch red tape to chase on the cars at a high price they demanded. I went in to tractors in 1990 because my dad was raised on a farm and my grandpa had past on. Every body in his family had sold the farm and Equipment. I was hooked on tractors and just had to get in to them. I did and I can say now I never regret it.
 
Yes I do know that one you are talking about. My dad had a friend who had one of those. they where nice but I am sorry they where no match to the Land Rover.
 
My dad had a 1972 Scout 2 which it had a six cylinder engine in it. I think it was either a Studebaker or a Nash engine. Hard to say because I really never heard him talk about it. Those Scout I.H. models some where okay and some where a disappointment.
 
I never liked just having to mess with titles in our state so I never got too excited about cars either. Plus I don't like body work. But now the "rat rod" look is all the rage so you don't even have to paint them ! lol. Too bad I didn't buy a Mopar or 2 and restore them like I did my JD's. I could of sold the Mopars off and retired young !
 

We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today.

Back
Top