(quoted from post at 13:42:42 06/07/19)
(quoted from post at 11:23:42 06/07/19)
(quoted from post at 07:17:20 06/07/19)
I'd hope it gives you automotive paint performance since it IS automotive paint...
Yakob do you think that anyone else had trouble understanding my post?
Which post?
Your first post in this thread said "I don't agree at all" and then you proceeded to imply some of the same points as the OP, thereby agreeing in some ways. It is not possible to be in total disagreement while still maintaining any original point made by the other party as true. The essence of the OP could be captured as "buy NAPA paint since it is better for negligible cost difference, if any" and you made the same point, yet somehow in disagreement.
Your second post (the one I poked fun at) said "They [Nason] give you close to automotive paint performance at half to a third of what many automotive paints go for." See, what you have done here is not only make a price comparison specifically to the pool of more expensive automotive paints, but you have also compared Nason's performance to he entire pool of automotive paints and have deemed said performance as less than that of the entire pool. Since the entire pool to Nason would include itself, the claim logically boils down to "it cannot perform as good as itself" which cannot be true.
There was no lack of understanding, only sarcasm that seems to be lost on some people.
Do you think the sarcasm in my original post or in this current one was misunderstood by anyone else?