I never fired an 18th century mortar, but I've fired many a 60mm, 81mm and 4.2 mortar to tell you that the base plate absorbs the recoil. I've also dug many a base plate out of the mud as a result.
 
(quoted from post at 15:19:01 11/07/18) have not been able to find an answer. did 18th century mortars have recoil ?
thanks.

Better yet, why would you think it would not have recoil?

I'm with Mr. Newton on this one.
 
that's what I have been finding. baseplate takes up the shock. the big old ones had huge base plates.
 
(quoted from post at 04:43:40 11/08/18) that's what I have been finding. baseplate takes up the shock. the big old ones had huge base plates.

One of those old mortars is just a very short barreled cannon. Do cannons have recoil? I still don't understand why you thought they may not have recoil.
 
(quoted from post at 11:48:02 11/08/18) cannons move from recoil mortars do not. (unless they dig into ground upon which they rest)
annons absorb the recoil by moving, the mortars assort the recoil pressing against the ground.. Newton's law!!
 
(quoted from post at 11:12:54 11/08/18)
(quoted from post at 11:48:02 11/08/18) cannons move from recoil mortars do not. (unless they dig into ground upon which they rest)
annons absorb the recoil by moving, the mortars assort the recoil pressing against the ground.. Newton's law!!

It's still a contained explosion and every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Would a mortar have to be held to your shoulder and fired to have recoil?

It's just such a strange question that I can't understand why it was asked. Why would the explosion in a mortar not have an equal and opposite reaction?
 
If a man expresses an opinion in the forest without a woman around to hear him, is he still wrong?
 

We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today.

Back
Top