Saw your post on the recent Haying thread -
I have a 9ft sickle moco. It puts the hay in a nice wide windrow. I leave it for a day or so, then v-rake 2 or 3 rows into a bigger windrow for the 605H, wait another day then bale. If really hot I can cut in day 1, rake early in day 2 and bale later in the day. No tedding. All grass hay, no alfalfa.
1. If I go to a drum, will I still be able to do this or will I always have to ted the hay, then rake it? In other words, do the 2 windrows dry well or do they need to be spread out?
2. I have a smaller tractor (ford 3cyl 2000) that I am thinking would be perfect for a drum. We only use it to rake now. I have just enough weight/HP for the 190 version but wondering if the 175 is the better choice. Seems like a lot more money for 10in more cut and a lot more weight. I have small fields so maneuverability is important. That 9ft moco is painful in a 1.5 acre field but I also have a few 10 ac fields.
Comments?
I have a 9ft sickle moco. It puts the hay in a nice wide windrow. I leave it for a day or so, then v-rake 2 or 3 rows into a bigger windrow for the 605H, wait another day then bale. If really hot I can cut in day 1, rake early in day 2 and bale later in the day. No tedding. All grass hay, no alfalfa.
1. If I go to a drum, will I still be able to do this or will I always have to ted the hay, then rake it? In other words, do the 2 windrows dry well or do they need to be spread out?
2. I have a smaller tractor (ford 3cyl 2000) that I am thinking would be perfect for a drum. We only use it to rake now. I have just enough weight/HP for the 190 version but wondering if the 175 is the better choice. Seems like a lot more money for 10in more cut and a lot more weight. I have small fields so maneuverability is important. That 9ft moco is painful in a 1.5 acre field but I also have a few 10 ac fields.
Comments?