| Author |
[Modern View] |
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
   these are scans from a 1966 buyers guide and they all have some thing wrong in them,,,, can any body see them?,,, a little hint on the second pic, it is listed on the 960 pages
|
|
|
|
|
JDB
02-17-2013 15:42:27
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
Operator is sitting sideways on picture 2
|
|
|
|
Ande
02-12-2013 18:44:07
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
Tom,did I miss what was different on the "1200" above? Was it just the subsoiler?
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-12-2013 19:04:13
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Ande, 02-12-2013 18:44:07
|
|
| |
the print say's it's a six shank and it's only five Dan
|
|
|
|
Allen Goodman
02-11-2013 20:34:10
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
Couldn't help it, but I just got a 1200 TK last week on part trade for a JD 8640 we had here on the lot. Cab, 2101 hours, not even a crack in the seat. Very nice unit.
|
|
|
|
55 50 Ron
02-11-2013 20:08:53
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
On 2nd picture, it looks like the unloading auger is too far toward the back.
|
|
|
|
muleboss
02-11-2013 19:25:01
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
No air in the left rear tire.
|
|
|
|
wheat straw
02-11-2013 17:56:25
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
the second machine is a 660.
|
|
|
|
Kav
02-11-2013 17:56:03
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
Didn't they fit the variable speed Cylinder Belt system to all the 660 Combines?
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 18:00:35
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Kav, 02-11-2013 17:56:03
|
|
| |
no, the belt/cylinder variable was optional on 660/960 combines chain drive was std
|
|
|
|
Ande
02-11-2013 17:47:09
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
Well Tom,
Going to take a stab at the "1200",there is no Air Stack
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 17:56:00
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Ande, 02-11-2013 17:47:09
|
|
| |
Dan the air cleaner's were mounted by the LH steps right at the LH side of the dash so in this pic it's not visable
|
|
|
|
Ande
02-11-2013 18:26:21
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 17:56:00
|
|
| |
That's correct Tom,but thought for a while here,and the "1200" didnt come with a extended air stack.So,I was wrong. Will keep looking here
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 18:52:10
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Ande, 02-11-2013 18:26:21
|
|
|
 here is a shot of just a early 1200, some thing is different about this pic too,, any one see it?
|
|
|
|
1370rod
02-11-2013 19:38:29
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 18:52:10
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 20:02:18
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to 1370rod, 02-11-2013 19:38:29
|
|
| |
YEP!! the one I have the grill was painted Flambeau also I wonder how many out there are? cnt
|
|
|
|
1370rod
02-11-2013 19:40:08
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to 1370rod, 02-11-2013 19:38:29
|
|
| |
Is there a chrome strip in the middle of the hood?
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 20:18:34
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to 1370rod, 02-11-2013 19:40:08
|
|
| |
not sure by the pic will do some more looking in the morning
|
|
|
|
Ande
02-11-2013 19:11:56
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 18:52:10
|
|
| |
Tom,how about the fender lights on this one?
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 20:03:04
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Ande, 02-11-2013 19:11:56
|
|
|
dbock
02-11-2013 17:40:36
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
The 960 in the second pic looks like it has a 188 diesel in it. I'm not sure that was a option. The for-aft on the reel is crooked.
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 20:15:52
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to dbock, 02-11-2013 17:40:36
|
|
| |
I had not seen the reel looks way off for some reason
|
|
|
|
dbock
02-11-2013 17:31:10
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
The decals on the back of the combine are wrong in the last picture. Looks like a 700 decal instead of a 960. Heck it might be a 700.
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 17:59:03
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to dbock, 02-11-2013 17:31:10
|
|
| |
good eye that's what I was looking for, except it is a 900 not a 700 as the 700 had a smaller bin, also telltale signs are the 700/early 900 steering wheel and console controls are different on the 600/700/900 machines compared to a 960 thanks guys for playing cnt
|
|
|
|
just thinkin
02-11-2013 17:30:08
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
All of the reels where yellow on the Case combines in our area.
|
|
|
|
Jeff From WI.
02-11-2013 17:23:42
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
Soybeans are combined in the fall.
|
|
|
|
1370rod
02-11-2013 17:10:30
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
Geeeez Tom, three at a time,my brain is on standby now that the workin day is over. But I will guess in the top pic thats a 5 shank not a 6 as stated, in the second pic is that a 660 and not a 960, last pic, heck I don't know, only thing that seems odd is there are no lights on the machine, Rod.
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 17:15:39
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to 1370rod, 02-11-2013 17:10:30
|
|
| |
Rod, you got the first two but tell me this,, why do you say it's a 660? and the last one well lights were optional so no thats not it cnt
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 17:45:29
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 17:15:39
|
|
| |
you guy's are both right it is a 4 cylinder its also a dsl also gaser's only have one battery and 960's had no dsl option at all
|
|
|
|
1370rod
02-11-2013 17:33:37
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 17:15:39
|
|
| |
Looking down at the engine it looks like the 4cly, not the slant 6
|
|
|
|
just thinkin
02-11-2013 17:32:32
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 17:15:39
|
|
| |
It has a four cylinder upright engine.
|
|
|
|
Roger in Iowa
02-11-2013 17:09:11
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
| |
First picture only has 5 subsoiler shanks, not 6.
|
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 17:13:38
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Roger in Iowa, 02-11-2013 17:09:11
|
|
|
rgorange
02-11-2013 17:04:56
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to Case Nutty 1660, 02-11-2013 16:43:55
|
|
|
Case Nutty 1660
02-11-2013 17:16:27
|
|
Re: what's wrong with this pic? in reply to rgorange, 02-11-2013 17:04:56
|
|
| |
all 1200's had a under-slung exhaust
|
|
|
