Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tool Talk Discussion Board

Re: Tri-plex


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by david - or on August 03, 2013 at 23:41:36 from (184.76.14.88):

In Reply to: Re: Tri-plex posted by George Marsh on August 03, 2013 at 17:18:18:

There is a big difference between overhead rated (ACSR) triplex and underground-rated triplex or quadplex (typically type USE).

It"s not the triplex/quadplex that"s the issue; its the overhead-rated nature of the triplex the original poster posited.

Overhead rated triplex has thin insulation befitting use in free-air and a steel center wire on the messenger that makes the wire strong enough to hang from poles. Underground rated triplex/quadplex has thick insulation for use in continuously wet locations (not to mention direct bury) and a plain-vanilla aluminum ground/neutral.

Underground triplex is still bulky, but it is much more flexible, and can be pulled through (big enough) conduit. Most of my objections to using "triplex" in an attic (or in conduit)
disappear if we are talking wire not rated for overhead use. It"s entirely possible that the installations described by John T and George Marsh were completely code compliant (I"m a little unsure on the code compliance of USE inside buildings for a building to building feeder application.)

But it is clearly fine to enclose it in conduit for a service entrance emerging from the ground, and there may in fact be no other way to do it (it must be protected from physical damage inside buildings.)

But the original poster was pretty clear that his triplex was overhead-rated, and it would be pretty wrong to say that there"s no issue with that.

One more note: electric utilities are regulated by their own code; NOT the National Electrical Code. It is assumed that utilities employ electrical engineers to supervise the processes that they use for distribution.

No such assumption is made for commercial/residential wiring, and the NEC is more conserviative.

The dividing line between utility rules and NEC rules is the "service drop" for an overhead installation (basically the drip loop and splices up on the roof). For an underground installation it is the electric meter or service disconnect means.

In general, overhead-rated triplex is stuff used by utilities, and that"s one reason there"s not much (if any) discussion of it in the NEC.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Madison's County - by Anthony West. Philip Madison has been a good friend of mine for quite some time. He has patiently suffered my incessant chit chat on the subject of tractors for longer than I care to remember, and on many occasions he has put himself out, dropped what ever it was he was doing, to come and lend a hand cranking handles, or loading a find onto a trailer. Although he himself has never actually owned or restored a tractor, he was always enthusiastic and always around helping with other peoples projects. ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Super WD9. [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy