Nothing wrong with having an opinion. As long as we seem to be having a good conversation - and agree both conventional and organic have their place, I'll go through your list with my thoughts.
> They have some hard evidense that organic farming can compete with conventional yields.
Organic yields can be good, but often they choose the better land to use, while comparing to conventional farming on all acres, good & bad. It becomes a hand-picked winning sample vs a generic average. Little biased for a conclusion of which is 'better'.
>Then if you figure in lower input costs and net profit is way better as organic even at slightly less yield.
My understanding is that organic fertilizers cost more per unit of N, P, or K because they have to be special, and the seed I see in the catalogs is always more expensive. More diesel is used to control weeds, and at least for me it woould cost more transportation to haul the crop to market. All of those things seem to make an organic crop more input costs, not less?
If we were all forced to return to organic farming - not something you prepose, but I hear it often enough from some groups - then the premium price paid for orgnic products would disappear, and you would need to survive on the low-ball commodity grain prices. I think in your own interests, you wouldn't want that.
You only get the premiumif organic is a small portion of farming.
> The only catch is you can't grow corn on corn organicly make any kind of crop.
Turns out, corn on corn ends up being pretty good for the ground - if you live in a climate that notill/ multch till works on. Carbon and soil organic matter grows in a corn on corn setup. While it uses more N, the corn on corn has some positives, too. I'm as blown away by that as anyone. Now I'm not saying corn on corn GMO is _better_ than organic farming - but perhaps there are some benifits to it that the organic crowd doesn't see as well?
> So I do think overall corn production would be down, but it wouldn't be long before more acres come on line to pick up production.
We don't owe the world - or the USA - cheap corn & cheap food. Much of the starvation in this world is caused by politics, not a lack of food. In the USA we throw almost 1/2 our food away. Nonetheless, many of the emerging, improving countries of the world are dependant upon importing a good portion of their food from other countries. India, China, Northern Africa, Japan, parts of Europe. If we were to do something to cut food supplies in the world, I think those mid-level countries would get in a panic, and have the ability to create some havic or retaliation....
And that is how I think your points are just a tad off. There are many folk - I now not you - that try to use those points to create some sort of world vision of how we all should life to their standards, and if only we would conform to their ways then the whole world would be milk and honey.
Again, I'm not ranting against organic at all. I kinda like it - if we can keep an open mind about all of it.
--->Paul