Yesterday's Tractor Co.
Shop Now View Cart
   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts

Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Tractor Town
Your Stories
Show & Pull Guide
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs

Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

Related Sites
Tractor Shed
Ford 8N/9N Club
Today's Tractors
Garden Tractors
Classic Trucks
Kountry Life
Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

Re: New Job

[Show Entire Topic]  

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author  [Modern View]
Billy NY

04-19-2013 13:22:59

Report to Moderator

If there was a line item and the description was funding to maintain a building and there was a way it could be done without the conflict of interest which was stated below and true, I'd be all for it. (PS I actually missed your wording of "line item") but it came to mind just the same as you put it.

There is the side of this you mention, no doubt and that is exactly why its coming down. I have a background in heavy/commercial construction and know large buildings as much as the next guy, not all will stand the test of time and not all of those will because of disrepair, it does take funds.

An industrial building built for manufacturing, long obsolete, unless there is a re-use and its feasible, ok fine lets do it, but like so many of those sites, its impractical, not feasible and as is without site remediation its a hazard, it has to be made right and rightfully so for the community, yes I love old architecture too, but agree with you on that, some don't and they have a right not to, but in the long run, its for the best when an abandoned industrial site is cleaned up and made right for the next use of the site.

In this case, its a community thing, this particular building was in good condition, its a church and if people had to pay to keep it, its hard to say if it would have worked, or some other alternatives could have been implemented to supplement it, this is not an old industrial site, nor has it a famous architect that I know of. I disagree with the demolition of it regardless, because of what it is, a magnificent church, however a developer bought it fair and square to develop and profit from it, once they got the approvals, people fought it for a few years, they won, they can build on the site and those of the parish are shuttered out, thats that. Now they get a new supermarket and there are those that will be happy with that and those that do not, the latter is me. Some things like this always leave something to be desired and sometimes even with a massive effort, it just won't fly, shameful but true.

In the nearby city here, during urban renewal of the 60's, they tore down the train station, of the same architecture of Grand Central in Manhattan, they pilfered all the valuable architectural items and materials and pocket'd the money themselves, corrupt politicians, you used to be able to take a train from here, they saw fit for their own and their associates profit and the heck with the citizens.

We had an old large victorian house, would have taken a ton of money to re-use it, rehabilitate it etc., town condemned it we fought and beat them, but the contractor still had gotten it down, in a sense they did us a favor, cost was on the town for the legal mistakes they made, still shameful, but its a tall order to keep something like that, when you are busy and work hundreds of miles away. Was not a practical building, was a beautiful house, but like so many old barns, no practical use given the size and layout.

Some buildings are worth fighting for, some are not and not everyone agrees on that, LOL !

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
[Show Entire Topic]     [Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:

Fast Shipping!  Most of our stocked parts ship within 24 hours (M-Th). Expedited shipping available, just call! Most prices for parts and manuals are below our competitors. Compare our super low shipping rates! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor. We are a company you can trust and have generous return policies. Shop Online Today or call our friendly sales staff toll free (800) 853-2651. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums

Copyright © 1997-2016 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters