Yes, I have handled wet concrete with bare hands and know how hard it is on the skin. (Calling it a "burn" is overstating things in my opinion). A statement like "concrete contains acid" just doesn't ring true to anyone that can remember a bit of high school chemistry and has handled cement powder, or remembers that cement is made from limestone. You don't have to know the specific chemical reaction of the hardening of concrete to know that a statement like "concrete has acid" CANNOT be correct. Cement powder forms calcium hydroxide when mixed with water. Give the proximity of calcium and sodium in the periodic table, it should be no surprise that wet cement (containing calcium hydroxide) has properties similar to lye (sodium hydroxide). Both are strong bases, both are caustic, both are about as far away from being ACIDS as any substance can be. Strong acids and a strong bases are both highly reactive substances, and either MAY have a tendency to break down wood fibers. (Though anyone that's played with such chemicals knows that organic materials do not immediately dissolve in a haze of smoke like in the movies; and there seems to be little consensus on the original issue of wood posts set in concrete). A good engineer would try to simplify a statement so that his customer could understand the practical implications, but at the same time, generally resists saying things that are grossly inaccurate. So I can understand a structural engineer telling you that "concrete contains caustic substances that eat wood posts", but saying that these are "acids" is carrying simplification way too far.
|