Yesterday's Tractor Co. Shop Now
   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts

Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Tractor Town
Your Stories
Show & Pull Guide
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs

Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

Related Sites
Tractor Shed
Ford 8N/9N Club
Today's Tractors
Garden Tractors
Classic Trucks
Kountry Life
Oliver, Cletrac, Co-op & Cockshutt Tractors Discussion Forum
Show Parts for Model:

Re: 2-105 vs. 125 Workhorse Clutch

[Show Entire Topic]  

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author  [Modern View]

12-21-2012 09:33:13

Report to Moderator

Have you called Southbend? I know of at least one dealer who, back when BMD was making clutches, contacted them and had them make a reduced force version with the same clamp force. They had no problem doing so, but maintained the same clamp force. So, it can be done.

But to answer your question, total force on the clutch and diameter are what's important. If you had a clutch that was several feet in diameter, you wouldn't need much force. If it was 6" in diameter, you'd need a huge amount of force to have the same holding power.

The reduced pressure 145 clutch is what was used in the 100's. They are great to use in low horsepower conversions. I don't have the exact data in front of me, but I think it has less holding force.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Merlin in Rushford

12-21-2012 10:48:49

Report to Moderator
 Re: 2-105 vs. 125 Workhorse Clutch in reply to e, 12-21-2012 09:33:13  
Thank you for the replies!
I was not aware that the White 100 had a reduced-effort clutch assembly. I know there were some other drivetrain changes to reduce weight and cost (i.e. smaller rear axles). Thanks again!
Merlin in Rushford, MN

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Show Entire Topic]     [Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:

Fast Shipping!  Most of our stocked parts ship within 24 hours (M-Th). Expedited shipping available, just call! Most prices for parts and manuals are below our competitors. Compare our super low shipping rates! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor. We are a company you can trust and have generous return policies. Shop Online Today or call our friendly sales staff toll free (800) 853-2651. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums

Copyright © 1997-2018 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters