(quoted from post at 16:03:13 12/18/11) Actually, 18 to 19 quarts is fine. And the fluid is also used by the hydraulic system. I use 80-90 wt. mineral oil in mine.
(quoted from post at 13:51:55 12/19/11) Thanks for the clarification, although I don't think I have a hang up about the term "mineral oil" - just being lazy. Folks around here differentiate 90wt transmission mineral oil from UTF and gear lube. When I ask for mineral oil for my tractor transmission, this is what I get:
<img src="http://okiedoke.com/8n/90wtoil.jpg">
TOH said:<EM> - So any conventionally refined UTF is in fact "SAE 80 mineral oil". - </EM>
I was not aware of this. My understanding was that many UTFs were lighters oils, as reports of increased UTF oil leakage by some "N" owners who have used both UTF and GL1 "mineral oil". I've also read that oil which conforms to specification M2C134D (Ford-New Holland spec for "N" tractors) is equivalent to an SAE rating of between 40-50. Obviously I'm no tribologist.
(quoted from post at 15:20:21 12/19/11)(quoted from post at 13:51:55 12/19/11) Thanks for the clarification, although I don't think I have a hang up about the term "mineral oil" - just being lazy. Folks around here differentiate 90wt transmission mineral oil from UTF and gear lube. When I ask for mineral oil for my tractor transmission, this is what I get:
<img src="http://okiedoke.com/8n/90wtoil.jpg">
TOH said:<EM> - So any conventionally refined UTF is in fact "SAE 80 mineral oil". - </EM>
I was not aware of this. My understanding was that many UTFs were lighters oils, as reports of increased UTF oil leakage by some "N" owners who have used both UTF and GL1 "mineral oil". I've also read that oil which conforms to specification M2C134D (Ford-New Holland spec for "N" tractors) is equivalent to an SAE rating of between 40-50. Obviously I'm no tribologist.
First off I wasn't picking on you in particular - your post just happened to be the last of many that finally elicited my comment. I'm not a tribologist either but you don't have to be one to understand how the [b:75f4b5a087]grading[/b:75f4b5a087] system works. And it does not work like the vast, vast majority of people think.
The SAE viscosity numbers are viscosity [b:75f4b5a087]grade labels[/b:75f4b5a087] not units of measure - sort of like light, medium, and heavy. Sometimes I think the SAE would have been better off if they had actually gone that route instead of using numbers. And to make matters worse there are different grading standards for gear oil (SAE J306) and motor oil (SAE J300). The J300 motor oil grades are designated SAE 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60. The J306 gear oil grades are designated SAE 80, 85, 90, 110. 140, 190, and 240. And while the motor oil and gear oil grade [u:75f4b5a087][b:75f4b5a087]numbers[/b:75f4b5a087][/u:75f4b5a087] do no overlap the [u:75f4b5a087][b:75f4b5a087]actual viscosities[/b:75f4b5a087][/u:75f4b5a087] associated with those numbered grades do. Here is a subset of the full specifications - if you want way more detail try my little monograph on the subject: [u:75f4b5a087]J300 Explained[/u:75f4b5a087]
SAE J300 motor oil viscosity grades:
SAE 30 - 9.3-12.4 cSt @100C
SAE 40 - 12.5-16.2 cSt@100C
SAE 50 - 16.3 - 21.8 cSt @100C
SAE J306 gear oil viscosity grades:
SAE 80 - 7.0 - 10.9 cSt @100C
SAE 85 - 11.0 - 13.4 cSt @100C
SAE 90 - 13.5 - 18.4 cSt @100C
Which brings us to UTF type lubricants which are technically not a motor oil or a gear oil and as such are not tested to and don't qualify for an official API/SAE "starburst" viscosity label. But when folks - including the OEM - decide to put an SAE grade number on a UTF product for "informative" purposes they have to choose: motor oil or gear oil grade? Case in point - CNH Ambra 134G universal fluid (e.g. M2C-134D). I emailed the OEM that makes that product for CNH and the specified viscosity is 9.4 cSt @ 100C. That makes it either SAE 30 using the J300 motor oil specification or SAE 80 using the J306 gear oil specification. Two differnt viscosity grade labels but in fact the same viscosity - take your pick either one is "correct". Hence a lot of confusion. I've looked at a lot of UTF product specifications and they fall somewhere in the 9.0 cSt to 11.5 cSt range. So if you want to scare someone off of UTF tell them its SAE 30 oil. If you want to make them comfortable with it tell them its SAE 80 or 85 oil. If you want to be coldly scientific and accurate about it tell them that depending on the brand and formulation it has a viscosity somewhere in the range 9.0 - 11.5 cSt @100C. And either way it's mineral oil ;-)
TOH
(quoted from post at 09:22:28 06/14/16)(quoted from post at 15:20:21 12/19/11)(quoted from post at 13:51:55 12/19/11) Thanks for the clarification, although I don't think I have a hang up about the term "mineral oil" - just being lazy. Folks around here differentiate 90wt transmission mineral oil from UTF and gear lube. When I ask for mineral oil for my tractor transmission, this is what I get:
<img src="http://okiedoke.com/8n/90wtoil.jpg">
TOH said:<EM> - So any conventionally refined UTF is in fact "SAE 80 mineral oil". - </EM>
I was not aware of this. My understanding was that many UTFs were lighters oils, as reports of increased UTF oil leakage by some "N" owners who have used both UTF and GL1 "mineral oil". I've also read that oil which conforms to specification M2C134D (Ford-New Holland spec for "N" tractors) is equivalent to an SAE rating of between 40-50. Obviously I'm no tribologist.
First off I wasn't picking on you in particular - your post just happened to be the last of many that finally elicited my comment. I'm not a tribologist either but you don't have to be one to understand how the [b:9badd62c49]grading[/b:9badd62c49] system works. And it does not work like the vast, vast majority of people think.
The SAE viscosity numbers are viscosity [b:9badd62c49]grade labels[/b:9badd62c49] not units of measure - sort of like light, medium, and heavy. Sometimes I think the SAE would have been better off if they had actually gone that route instead of using numbers. And to make matters worse there are different grading standards for gear oil (SAE J306) and motor oil (SAE J300). The J300 motor oil grades are designated SAE 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60. The J306 gear oil grades are designated SAE 80, 85, 90, 110. 140, 190, and 240. And while the motor oil and gear oil grade [u:9badd62c49][b:9badd62c49]numbers[/b:9badd62c49][/u:9badd62c49] do no overlap the [u:9badd62c49][b:9badd62c49]actual viscosities[/b:9badd62c49][/u:9badd62c49] associated with those numbered grades do. Here is a subset of the full specifications - if you want way more detail try my little monograph on the subject: [u:9badd62c49]J300 Explained[/u:9badd62c49]
SAE J300 motor oil viscosity grades:
SAE 30 - 9.3-12.4 cSt @100C
SAE 40 - 12.5-16.2 cSt@100C
SAE 50 - 16.3 - 21.8 cSt @100C
SAE J306 gear oil viscosity grades:
SAE 80 - 7.0 - 10.9 cSt @100C
SAE 85 - 11.0 - 13.4 cSt @100C
SAE 90 - 13.5 - 18.4 cSt @100C
Which brings us to UTF type lubricants which are technically not a motor oil or a gear oil and as such are not tested to and don't qualify for an official API/SAE "starburst" viscosity label. But when folks - including the OEM - decide to put an SAE grade number on a UTF product for "informative" purposes they have to choose: motor oil or gear oil grade? Case in point - CNH Ambra 134G universal fluid (e.g. M2C-134D). I emailed the OEM that makes that product for CNH and the specified viscosity is 9.4 cSt @ 100C. That makes it either SAE 30 using the J300 motor oil specification or SAE 80 using the J306 gear oil specification. Two differnt viscosity grade labels but in fact the same viscosity - take your pick either one is "correct". Hence a lot of confusion. I've looked at a lot of UTF product specifications and they fall somewhere in the 9.0 cSt to 11.5 cSt range. So if you want to scare someone off of UTF tell them its SAE 30 oil. If you want to make them comfortable with it tell them its SAE 80 or 85 oil. If you want to be coldly scientific and accurate about it tell them that depending on the brand and formulation it has a viscosity somewhere in the range 9.0 - 11.5 cSt @100C. And either way it's mineral oil ;-)
TOH
I know this is an old post but it is exactly what I needed. This clears up every question I had about choosing the correct fluid for my new to me 1940 9N. I too was confused about labels indentifying 90 weight gear oil versus 30 weight UTF.
I'll be using the Rotella UTF in my 9N.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today.
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters
Website Accessibility Policy