Question on Loader Removal of MF202

NCmau

Member
I have to remove the loader for a clutch replacement. This question maybe basic but I need an opinion before I attempt this task and see how some of you would approached it.

Method 1. After hanging the loader to an overhead beam by the arms/frame pivot point, it appears that I should be able to slide the tractor out leaving the subframe, loader arms and the bucket intact. Before I would slide the tractor all the way out, I would lift the loader so that the back of the subframe would clear the front axle. I ran this move few times in my mind and it seems like it would work… but I may not visualize potential problems.

Method 2. Another approach would be to detach the loader arms from the subframe first, slide out the tractor w/subframe and then remove the subframe. This approach would require more space and be more labor intense. It would not be my first choice.

Opinions???
 
I haven't split a MF with a front end loader, but I have done a few Ford tractors with loaders, and done them either like this.
4686.jpg


Or like this.
4687.jpg
 
(quoted from post at 15:53:30 10/13/17) I haven't split a MF with a front end loader, but I have done a few Ford tractors with loaders, and done them either like this.
4686.jpg


Or like this.
4687.jpg

Wow !! never would have thought of doing it that way. :wink:

Great pix.
 
(quoted from post at 01:03:10 10/14/17) I found those pictures on the internet, but that's how the Ford mechanics do the Ford's.

That's very interesting. If I was doing the splitting, I would probably try this method. I did a separation when I was younger. This time, however, is going to the shop. Thanks for the info.
 
I am posting this info for the benefit of this forum. As I was proceeding to remove the loader with method 1, I realized that in order to remove the loader and frame in one rigid piece I would have also remove the nose frame in front of the tractor. That’s an heavy booger. Also the clearances were little bit too tight for my comfort. So I decided to use method 2 instead.
Actually it worked better much than I had anticipated. I removed the loader first, then each of the two frame components were easily managed with a hoist, 4 bolts each. Since I have a grabble function and a flow control valve, the biggest PITA was the uncoupling of all the hydraulic hoses.
Anyway, this method applies to my tractor. Other tractor’s approach may well be different.
mvphoto4864.jpg


mvphoto4865.jpg
 
(quoted from post at 15:00:48 10/17/17) I am posting this info for the benefit of this forum. As I was proceeding to remove the loader with method 1, I realized that in order to remove the loader and frame in one rigid piece I would have also remove the nose frame in front of the tractor. That’s an heavy booger. Also the clearances were little bit too tight for my comfort. So I decided to use method 2 instead.
Actually it worked better much than I had anticipated. I removed the loader first, then each of the two frame components were easily managed with a hoist, 4 bolts each. Since I have a grabble function and a flow control valve, the biggest PITA was the uncoupling of all the hydraulic hoses.
Anyway, this method applies to my tractor. Other tractor’s approach may well be different.

When you say loader removal of MF202, are you talking about the loader on a MF202 Workbull or a loader with the model number 202?

The reason I asked is because I have an MF202 and needed to drain the radiator for something. I saw in the manual where the drain cock was but looked all around that big nose piece and decided that the nose piece was blocking access to it.

So I used the petcock that was on the engine block on the right side of the engine. I didn't wan't to mess around with that nose piece figuring that it must weigh a ton.
 

It is the loader on the Workbull. I have no idea what brand the loader is. It does not look like an MF loader. I suspect is a Ford loader because when I painted it few years ago it had a Ford blue undercoating.
On my tractor the radiator drain cock is located on the right, bottom inside, as shown on the pic. Maybe you have a different nose than mine. Here is a pic what mine looks like.
mvphoto4878.jpg


mvphoto4879.jpg
 
(quoted from post at 10:19:08 10/18/17)
It is the loader on the Workbull. I have no idea what brand the loader is. It does not look like an MF loader. I suspect is a Ford loader because when I painted it few years ago it had a Ford blue undercoating.
On my tractor the radiator drain cock is located on the right, bottom inside, as shown on the pic. Maybe you have a different nose than mine. Here is a pic what mine looks like.
mvphoto4878.jpg


mvphoto4879.jpg

Looks like the same nose as mine. Maybe I just didn't look close enough or maybe it's covered up with crud. I'll give it a closer look. Thanks.
 

Wow, that's a great looking machine, NCmau! I've never seen a 202 that was painted MF red, I've only seen industrial yellow!
 
(quoted from post at 13:56:43 10/19/17)
Wow, that's a great looking machine, NCmau! I've never seen a 202 that was painted MF red, I've only seen industrial yellow!

Thanks. I painted it about 5 years ago. Industrial yellow it's just not my thing.
 

We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today.

Back
Top