I've got a hay preservative applicator on my JD348. The nozzles are mounted on the top front face of the baler as the hay comes into the auger off the pick-up. Works fine.
What I don't like is - much of the time, the hay doesn't cover the pick-up or when I'm going around the ends of a windrow, there is no hay being fed into the baler - as such, I'm spraying buffered propionic acid on the the baler vs hay. My system is on/off and I turn it off at the end of the windrows, but while all seems good with my present set-up, can't explain it - just don't like dumping the buffered propionic acid on the baler sheet metal and then down into the pick-up and auger area, even though I know the buffered acid shouldn't cause rust.
What I'm thinking about is relocating the nozzles to the forward most part of the windguard over the pick-up such that if and when the buffered propionic acid is not hitting the hay, it is falling to the ground in front of the pick-up and not all over my baler. IMHO - this minimizes the clean-up too as only the hay gets sprayed, any dry hay wicks up whatever residue is in the throat/auger area.
Question is (and I'm drawing a blank) - is the forward bar of your JD baler's windguard pushing against the windrow or is the hay well under it such that one might get a decent spray angle with a set of tips mounted there. I know this wouldn't work for my New Holland 68 as a narrow pick-up demands a tall windrow and sometimes I think hay is going to come over top of the windguard on that baler! The 348 pick-up is much wider and I can't remember what's going on with the hay and windguard. Youtube videos of the 347 and 348 that I've seen appear to have a goodly amount of vertical distance between the hay and the front cross tube of the windguard.
What say you?
Thanks,
Bill
What I don't like is - much of the time, the hay doesn't cover the pick-up or when I'm going around the ends of a windrow, there is no hay being fed into the baler - as such, I'm spraying buffered propionic acid on the the baler vs hay. My system is on/off and I turn it off at the end of the windrows, but while all seems good with my present set-up, can't explain it - just don't like dumping the buffered propionic acid on the baler sheet metal and then down into the pick-up and auger area, even though I know the buffered acid shouldn't cause rust.
What I'm thinking about is relocating the nozzles to the forward most part of the windguard over the pick-up such that if and when the buffered propionic acid is not hitting the hay, it is falling to the ground in front of the pick-up and not all over my baler. IMHO - this minimizes the clean-up too as only the hay gets sprayed, any dry hay wicks up whatever residue is in the throat/auger area.
Question is (and I'm drawing a blank) - is the forward bar of your JD baler's windguard pushing against the windrow or is the hay well under it such that one might get a decent spray angle with a set of tips mounted there. I know this wouldn't work for my New Holland 68 as a narrow pick-up demands a tall windrow and sometimes I think hay is going to come over top of the windguard on that baler! The 348 pick-up is much wider and I can't remember what's going on with the hay and windguard. Youtube videos of the 347 and 348 that I've seen appear to have a goodly amount of vertical distance between the hay and the front cross tube of the windguard.
What say you?
Thanks,
Bill