(800) 853-2651
SHOP NOW

New Holland 271 Baler

S

smokenrust

New User
This message is a reply to an archived post by RustyS on May 28, 2014 at 18:52:45.
The original subject was "New Holland 271 Baler".

I am going to hijack this thread and ask some questions.
I have been looking at a Super Hayliner 69 and at a New Holland 271... Is there any difference in them other than the sheet metal?
Are they faster than a 273 baler with the rotary feed in them?
Or should I just wait for a NH 277, 278 or a 320 to come along? Thanks, Smokenrust
 
The 269 is an older baler that has an 'oddball' feeding system.The 273 is newer.And in my opinion a better baler.273 is more common to the 276 and others than the 269
 
Think the 269 was the long pole 268... there was a Super 268, that had a different feed system in it, like the old model 68 I believe. The standard 268 was also belt drive pickup where the 273 was slip clutch... and the feeder assembly was slightly different as the tin work was too.
The 270 and 271 (short pole, long pole)were marketed at the same time as the 268/269/272 were being made (short pole, long pole, and engine only).
But what I don't know is, are the Super hayliner S69 and the 271 the same baler under the sheet metal? The same capacities?
Wolfman said, "A 271 will eat hay. A 273 won't. 273 much slower - lower capacity" - I read on a NH brochure for 268 and 271 that the capacity was 14 tons/hr... for both of them!mmm maybe brochure wrong? LOL
 
Are you wanting the larger bale size??? You are listing models that are larger. All of them would be faster than the NH273. The NH 273 was a fine lower capacity baler.
 
The 68, S69, 268, 269, 272, 270, 271, 276, 277, 278, 310, 315, 320 are all 14X18 chambered balers...
We had a 68 baler that was traded in for the 273 and that was a good trade, much better baler.

The model 280, 281, 282, 283, 285, 286, 420, 430, were 16X18 chambered.

Models '99', 290, 500 were 16X23" 3 string or wire as listed in the 'Offcial Guide' from 1981.

What I was wondering was what were the capacitys of the older 14X18 and the differences in the S69 /271 etc. thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
New Holland 420 Baler, can I put a thrower on it?
Replies
2
Views
273
Ken Waters
K
Tom in TN
More about my New Holland 273 baler
Replies
8
Views
454
Mike(NEOhio)
M
S
Poor baler I must of run it to 273 New Holland square ba
Replies
10
Views
1K
MSS3020
M
7
New Holland 851 Chain Baler
Replies
8
Views
576
79ta7.6
7
D
how good was the New Holland 277 square baler? banana ba
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
dwragon
D
Tractor Parts Tractor Manuals

We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today.

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters
Website Accessibility Policy

Back
Top