Author	[Modern View]
Leroy 12-14-2012 16:01:11 69.88.205.38 Report to Moderator	For his use he doesn't need that high a capacity of the new and a good complete rebuild job plus a backup baler of his same model that he has will cost less than the new baler. [Reply]   [No Email]
WyoDave 12-15-2012 06:38:55 97.124.201.219 Report to Moderator	Re: balers in reply to Leroy, 12-14-2012 16:01:11   He might not need a baler that has that kind of capacity, but then again I don"t need a dozen antique tractors or a home with indoor plumbing, but I still have them. If the man wants a newer baler and has the means then why try to persuade him to buy a headache or in your case, two of them? I"m a Deere fan, but I"ll bet if he springs for this 5050 he can bale his 3500 bales for the next 10 years without putting $100 worth of parts in it. That in itself is worth the added cost of newer, to many people. Also, in this area, good quality alfalfa/grass hay is bringing $10 a bale out of the stack, and rained on hay that layed in the field too long because the owners worn out baler couldn"t get the hay baled right is worth $5 a bale. Even on only 3500 bales that is the cost of the newer baler in one season. David [Reply]  [No Email]