Yesterday's Tractor Co. Trusted Parts Supplier since 1995
Click Here or call 800-853-2651 
   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Tractor Town
Your Stories
Show & Pull Guide
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

Related Sites
Tractor Shed
TractorLinks.com
Ford 8N/9N Club
Today's Tractors
Garden Tractors
Classic Trucks
Kountry Life
Enter your email address to receive our newsletter!

subscribe
unsubscribe
  
Combines & Harvesters Discussion Forum

Re: Why was the late 45 combine not offered with a diesel??

[Show Entire Topic]  

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author  [Modern View]
cooney minnie

01-23-2013 13:51:51
166.182.3.95



Report to Moderator

the 105s gas and diesel both used the same engine as a gas and diesel 4020. Fuel consumption would be similar to the tractors at load.

Our 105 diesel never has any power issues, and will handle 250 bushel irrigated corn with the 6 row head... no b.s! The issue is you can walk it over the back, slip the cylinder belt or run out of clean grain elevator capacity long before power. Ours is gear drive.

The biggest issue is the cylinder belt. the variable speed cylinder was only offered the last 2 years or so, and I don't think really perfected. I'm not sure, but I think it's the same drive that the 55 and 95 used, just with a bigger cylinder and engine on each side of the belt!

As for fuel consumption, it will run all day on a tank.

I must admit I feel a little empty writing this. We did buy a 9500 to replace her this fall, and she's still here (in the shed!). We bought her in 1989 and used it til this fall. Trying to do 250 acres with it though is getting to be too much, and some parts are darned hard to find.

She's a good friend though.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Fixerupper

01-23-2013 19:15:29
100.42.82.30



Report to Moderator
 Re: Why was the late 45 combine not offered with a diesel?? in reply to cooney minnie, 01-23-2013 13:51:51  
Cooney, I had to give a big sigh when I read your post. My 105 was a gasser but I ran her for 19 years and I felt the same way as you when I finally parked her in the shed for good. Jim



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
OLarry from MD

01-23-2013 15:31:05
97.73.64.149



Report to Moderator
 Re: Why was the late 45 combine not offered with a diesel?? in reply to cooney minnie, 01-23-2013 13:51:51  
I had one of each and the gas was a hercules engine with a reduction gear on the end.The diesel had the deere engine and no reduction.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
tomstractorsandtoys1

01-23-2013 15:05:15
64.136.27.161



Report to Moderator
 Re: Why was the late 45 combine not offered with a diesel?? in reply to cooney minnie, 01-23-2013 13:51:51  
Are you interested in selling it? Where are you located?We have a 4 row on our 95 gas and in 200 bu corn it is almost more than the machne can handle.It works ok if you travel in low gear as slow as the machine will go.After silage we do about 70 acers a year.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
cooney minnie

01-24-2013 05:17:41
166.182.3.195



Report to Moderator
 Re: Why was the late 45 combine not offered with a diesel?? in reply to tomstractorsandtoys1, 01-23-2013 15:05:15  
We are in SE WI.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Wilamayb

01-23-2013 14:08:25
164.144.248.26



Report to Moderator
 Re: Why was the late 45 combine not offered with a diesel?? in reply to cooney minnie, 01-23-2013 13:51:51  
According to the Nebraska tests there was a little over 2 gal/hr difference in fuel economy. It's a little over 25%



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Show Entire Topic]     [Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:

TRACTOR   PARTS TRACTOR   MANUALS
Same-Day Shipping! Most of our stocked parts ship the same day you order (M-F).  Expedited shipping available, just call!  Most prices for parts and manuals are below our competitors.  Compare our super low shipping rates!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor.  We are a Company you can trust and have generous return policies!   Shop Online Today or call our friendly sales staff toll free (800) 853-2651. [ More Info ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2014 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters