Yesterday's Tractor Co. We Have the Tractor Parts You Need
Click Here or call 800-853-2651 
   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Tractor Manuals
Tractor Parts
Classified Ads
Photo Ads

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Tractor Town
Your Stories
Show & Pull Guide
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

Related Sites
Tractor Shed
TractorLinks.com
Ford 8N/9N Club
Today's Tractors
Garden Tractors
Classic Trucks
Kountry Life
Enter your email address to receive our newsletter!

subscribe
unsubscribe
  
Combines & Harvesters Discussion Forum

what models replaced the following combines...

Author  [Modern View]
greenize

10-08-2012 12:35:13
50.36.96.199



Report to Moderator

These combines made in the 60's were replaced and I am trying to find out by what new models-help

John Deere models...55, 95, 105




[Reply]   [No Email]
4020guy

10-09-2012 06:26:30
68.171.72.108



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to greenize, 10-08-2012 12:35:13  
If I recall the sales literature said the 3300 replaced the 45, the 4400 the 55, the 6600 the 95, and the 7700 the 105. It said each new model had 25% more capacity than the one it replaced. I've had a 40,55,4400,and a 6600. Granted the older ones were easier to work on but the 00 series aren't that bad.....Ron



[Reply]  [No Email]
j hikemper

10-10-2012 20:53:39
50.102.66.99



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to 4020guy, 10-09-2012 06:26:30  
fogive me 4020 guy, and case / ih replaced them all................



[Reply]  [No Email]
Dalet

10-08-2012 19:12:34
184.94.141.146



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to R Wyler, 10-08-2012 12:35:13  
Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

Its alot easier to find a 95 hydro than a 4400 hydro too...



[Reply]  [No Email]
DeltaRed

10-08-2012 20:41:33
67.6.219.50



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to Dalet, 10-08-2012 19:12:34  
I've heard from several scources that a 95 will "smoke" a 4400....



[Reply]  [No Email]
Mike Aylward

10-08-2012 21:29:05
216.145.134.145



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to DeltaRed, 10-08-2012 20:41:33  
A diesel 4400 should have no problem keeping up with a 95. I used to own a 4400 and it kept up with a 105 in the same field. Actually, it did more than the 105. Has to be tuned, though. Mike



[Reply]  [No Email]
paul Em

10-08-2012 18:52:34
174.35.226.110



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to greenize, 10-08-2012 12:35:13  
I've only ever driven a 4420, and a white 7300 and I can't decide what I hated more. Engine beside me or directly behind....
This post was edited by paul Em at 18:54:18 10/08/12.



[Reply]  [No Email]
DeltaRed

10-08-2012 14:05:46
67.6.219.50



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to greenize, 10-08-2012 12:35:13  
Green and Sky are correct.BTW,even though they are older and somewhat more primitive,I would much rather own an x5 series than a xx00 series....



[Reply]  [No Email]
GreenEnvy

10-08-2012 18:26:37
216.220.12.48



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to DeltaRed, 10-08-2012 14:05:46  
I have both series and I like them both. If I had a couple of hundred acres to cut or less I would take a 5 series. If I had to cut 500 or more acres I would take a 00 series. Like others said, the 5 series are easier to work on and maintain but 00 series are more convenient to run IMO. Unless you have a 5 series from the last 2 years of production, they will have the chain drive cylinder and them stupid shims on the fan pulley. How many of the SB 5 series were diesel percentage wise compared to the 00 series. Same thing with hydros? Its a lot easier to find a 6600 or 770 hydro then a 105 or 95.

[Reply]  [No Email]
DeltaRed

10-08-2012 20:16:44
67.6.219.50



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to GreenEnvy, 10-08-2012 18:26:37  
I am very familiar with both series-more so with the x5 series.At present,I own :55 roundback;95 sb;late 105 corn(gas) speacial/variable speed cylinder;just sold my 45sb and have just purchaced a 105R(diesel).Not to be a "know it all",you probably cant tell me much about the x5 combines......but there is still much to learn!!



[Reply]  [No Email]
Bob Bancroft

10-08-2012 16:56:05
97.73.64.147



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to DeltaRed, 10-08-2012 14:05:46  
And figure this one out- when JD had the x5 series there were a few around here, but probably more Gleaners than anything. When JD came out with the xx00 series, they virtually took over the whole market here, and haven't looked back. I don't understand. The cab beside engine thing never appealed to me.



[Reply]  [No Email]
GreenEnvy

10-08-2012 18:18:22
216.220.12.48



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to Bob Bancroft, 10-08-2012 16:56:05  
Well back in the fall of 1969 when the 00 series came out, half the combines around here didn't even have cabs including ours. So I don't think the engine next to the cab was a big deal at that time. 20 years later different story. Plus the 00 series was the first really new combine seperator design since 1949. As good as the 5 series were, they were an old design that dated all the way back to the early 40s. JD did great work to stretch that design.

[Reply]  [No Email]
Nathaniel Watts

10-08-2012 14:37:27
174.130.134.178



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to DeltaRed, 10-08-2012 14:05:46  
I have to agree with Delta Red on that one. The early 4400 sure was not much of a replacement for a 95 in capacity either.



[Reply]  [No Email]
GreenEnvy

10-08-2012 13:38:27
216.220.12.48



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to greenize, 10-08-2012 12:35:13  
According to JD, the 3300 replaced the 45/55, 4400 replaced the 95, and 6600 replaced the 105. The 7700 was a new top of the line size.



[Reply]  [No Email]
greenize

10-08-2012 16:27:32
50.36.96.199



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to GreenEnvy, 10-08-2012 13:38:27  
thanks for info Kim :)



[Reply]  [No Email]
Skyhighballoon(MO)

10-08-2012 13:26:21
135.245.10.3



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to greenize, 10-08-2012 12:35:13  
I'm no JD person when it comes to combines...I'm a Gleaner guy... but for a fast answer the 45/55/95/105 (adding to your list) were replaced by the 3300/4400/6600/7700 and that series was later updated to the 4420/6620/7720 (I think the 3300 was dropped somewhere along they way, not sure what year so no 3320). The JD guys will come along and add much more info. Mike



[Reply]  [No Email]
greenize

10-08-2012 16:27:00
50.36.96.199



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to Skyhighballoon(MO), 10-08-2012 13:26:21  
Thanks for the info, Kim :)



[Reply]  [No Email]
RevJJ

10-08-2012 16:42:55
96.226.5.152



Report to Moderator
 Re: what models replaced the following combines... in reply to greenize, 10-08-2012 16:27:00  
I am here to tell you that a 4400 wouldn't work with a good, tuned up 95. I have read where JD felt that the 3300 was a replacement for the 55, the 4400 for the 95, the 6600 for the 105 and the 7700 was just a larger capacity machine that was a new size altogether.

As to using one, a 4400 is over 30 years old, and the 55 is 40...but unless you find a 4400 that was hermetically sealed in a barn in 1976, you are going to have to work on both of them...the 55 is A LOT better machine to work on. And a 4400 gasser can't be kept cool unless its not running.

[Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Return to Forum]   [Add a Reply]

Hop to:
TRACTOR   PARTS TRACTOR   MANUALS
Same-Day Shipping! Most of our stocked parts ship the same day you order (M-F).  Expedited shipping available, just call!  Most prices for parts and manuals are below our competitors.  Compare our super low shipping rates!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor.  We are a Company you can trust and have generous return policies!   Shop Online Today or call our friendly sales staff toll free (800) 853-2651. [ More Info ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2014 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters