Per my earlier post about my shifter binding and not being able to get it back to neutral - I took the advice and adjusted my TA linkage.
Hard to say for sure if it fixed the binding problem - but I drove it around and was unable to get it to bind - so a good sign.
That's the good news -
the worrying part is the amount of wear in the system (I think)
The linkage rod from the ta handle over to the toggle part that internally engages and disengages the ta clutch is WAY too long. (following IT manual adjustment instructions)
In the manual - the rod looks perfectly straight - but mine is bent, quite a bit - I assume to shorten it - as the clevis is already turned in as far as it can go.
Is it possible the TA clutch is so worn that I've got a huge amount of slack to take up? Could clutch wear work out to be several inches of length in this rod? or perhaps it's the wrong rod?
Wish I had pictures - it'd be easier to describe.
Again it all seems to be working ok now -but I'd like to hear opinions.
Hard to say for sure if it fixed the binding problem - but I drove it around and was unable to get it to bind - so a good sign.
That's the good news -
the worrying part is the amount of wear in the system (I think)
The linkage rod from the ta handle over to the toggle part that internally engages and disengages the ta clutch is WAY too long. (following IT manual adjustment instructions)
In the manual - the rod looks perfectly straight - but mine is bent, quite a bit - I assume to shorten it - as the clevis is already turned in as far as it can go.
Is it possible the TA clutch is so worn that I've got a huge amount of slack to take up? Could clutch wear work out to be several inches of length in this rod? or perhaps it's the wrong rod?
Wish I had pictures - it'd be easier to describe.
Again it all seems to be working ok now -but I'd like to hear opinions.